Logo

Blaring music disturbs National Library environs as employees enjoy picnic

Statesman News Service | Kolkata |

National Library authorities are sitting idle while a reportedly unauthorised employees’ union held a picnic inside the sprawling library complex today, in violation of rules, just a couple of days before the visit of the secretary in the union ministry of culture, Mr. Raghavendra Singh, to the prestigious central government institute.

Dr Arun Chakraborty, director general of the National Library at Alipore campus, said today that all unions inside the library premises are ‘unauthorised and unregistered’ and they organise get-togethers every year.

According to the Union ministry of culture rules under which the National Library operates, no picnics are allowed inside the library complex so as not to disturb the readers.

But a visit to the library this afternoon found the National Library Kormi Association (NLKA), reportedly a BJP-affiliated union that runs its office in the CPWD engineer’s room, organising a big picnic while blaring music from a sound box installed at the spot was audible even outside the library.

After being disturbed by the noise several readers of the library have informed the matter to the security personnel of the library, a senior security officer said, requesting anonymity.

The NLKA office was decorated with colourful union flags and banners while trendy Hindi movie songs blared on sound boxes throughout the day.

Some employees who are also members of the NLKA got angry with this correspondent and a photographer of a Bengali daily saying, “We are organising a picnic here. And why are you so interested?”

When asked what action is going to be taken Dr Chakraborty told The Statesman, “It’s a get-together and not a picnic. All unions organise this sort of programmes every year. Some time before an union had organised a similar programme where 500 people participated. I have no idea whether the organiser has used the sound box today.”
“All the unions inside the library complex are unauthorised and unregistered and this is going on for years,” Dr Chakraborty admitted.

But he had nothing to say when asked how he was going to stop this disturbance to the readers just a day before the visit of Mr Singh.
“Our union is registered and authorised and there is no doubt about it.

“ How did the authority allow the union to organise such a picnic using sound box inside the library complex ignoring the union ministry of culture’s rules,” said Saibal Chakraborty, secretary of the National Library Staff Association.

CM to hand over work order for Kolkata Eye on 29 Jan

Statesman News Service | Kolkata |

Chief minister Mamata Banerjee will hand over the work order for her dream project Kolkata Eye on 29 January paving the way for it to start operating from 2020.
The state government has received all clearances that are needed to start the project. Larsen & Toubro has been selected through a global tender and work is likely to start very soon.

The Kolkata Eye that seeks to recreate a London landmark at Millennium Park along the Hooghly will offer a view of the skyline and the Hooghly river. It will be the first of its kind in Asia and will thus serve as a major tourist attraction, said an official.

The giant wheel will be 135 metres in height, which is exactly the same as that of London Eye and will take 45 to 55 minutes for a complete round after starting from the ground level. It will carry a total of 480 persons at a time.

According to the proposal, the structure will possess 60 tubes with seating arrangement for eight persons in each of them. It will be a steel structure and parts will be assembled and erected at the site. If required technological assistance will be taken from Tokyo and Las Vegas.

The initial cost for the project was Rs 400 crore but it may rise due to certain technological inputs.

It is being estimated that once the construction begins, it will take two years to end the project. Thus, once the work order is handed over and the construction begins then the project will be completed by 2020.

Safe Drive Save Life Marathon today

Statesman News Service | Kolkata |

Numerous traffic diversions will be in effect owing to the ‘Safe Drive Save Life Half Marathon’ organized by Kolkata police tomorrow. Around 12000 participants will be in attendance.

Kolkata Police will observe “Road Safety Week 2018” from 7 January to 13 January.

The opening ceremony of the Road Safety Week will take place tomorrow at 6 a.m. before the initiation of the half marathon.

There will be 21Km run,10Km run,and a 5 Km run. According to Sumit Kumar,DC Traffic, 12000 participants have registered . There are cash prizes for the first,second,third and fourth positions for both men and women in the 21 Km and 10 Km runs.

For the different age categories in the 21 Km run,from 18 years -30 years,31 years – 45 years,46 years -60 years and above 60 years. The first prize, second prize,third prize and fourth prize will be amounts of Rs 25000,15000,10000 and 5000 respectively.

The marathon will begin at 6:30 a.m.For the 10 Km run the first prize, second prize, third prize and fourth prize will be amounts of Rs 20000,10000,5000 and 3000 respectively.

That race will begin from 7 a.m. For the 5 Km run participants all finishers will get medals.The race will begin at 7:30 a.m.All the participants in the different categories will get race day and finisher T~shirts.Photographers of all runners will be posted on their Facebook pages.

“Our idea is to make this race one of the best race, not just in Kolkata but in the entire country. We will continue to have this race on the first Sunday of every year,” said Additional Commissioner (I) of Police, Vineet Kumar Goyal.

The Safe Drive Save Life Half Marathon will be organized to “set the ball rolling for the Road Safety Week and promote the culture of safe driving and better road etiquette,” he added.

The 21 Km run participants will start from the basketball ground on Red Road before moving to CR Avenue and then take a right turn to Vivekananda Road and AJC Bose Road towards the Moulali,Mullickbazar and Beckbagan crossings.

There is a left turn to be taken to Ballygunge Circular Road and Judges Court Road.A right turn would then be taken to Alipore Road.National Library Avenue,Belvedre Road,Zeerut Bridge and JN Island before coming back to the venue.Traffic diversions will accordingly be made.

Attendance row: Four Jaipuria professors resign from respective posts

Statesman News Service | Kolkata |

Four professors of Seth Anandram Jaipuria College have given up their posts after they had a fall out with the principal of the college as the latter had allowed several students to appear for the final exams, inspite of not having the required attendance.

The incident takes place at a time when around 89 students in Deshbandhu College are being held back for not having the required attendance to sit for their examiantion.

The shift in-charge of the morning section and the evening section, along with head of the departments of commerce sections of Seth Anandram Jaipuria Collegegave up their posts.

There are about 655 students who will be appearing for their (honours) examination this year. Out of them about 140 students do not have the required attendance to sit for their finals. The principal allegedly allowed 32 students of the evening section to sit for the examination.

Morning shift in-charge, Mou Chatterjee, in-charge of the evening section Anil Shah along with professor Shanta Dutta and Radhanath Payn stepped down from their respective posts. They will, however, continue as professors of the college.

Professors alleged the attendance percentage of the preferred students of the evening section was increased by 10 per cent and the principal is allowing them to sit for the exam.
“Only his selective students are being allowed to sit for the exam. This discrimination cannot be accepted. We did not agree to his decision and so we have stepped down,” professor Anil Shah said.

The principal, however, said that due to reports of students’ unrest especially in the evening section of the college, parents did not send their wards to the college for a considerable time period.
“I have only allowed students of the evening section since the situation in this section last year was vulnerable and students felt insecured to come to the college. Students who have 50 per cent were given a grace percent age of 60 per cent,” the college principal, professor Ashoke Mukherjee said.

Cong leaders unhappy over Uluberia poll nominee

Statesman News Service | Kolkata |

After PCC chief Adhir Chowdhury, seeking to field a newcomer, announced the name of Mudassar Hossain Warsi to be the Congress nominee in the by-election for Uluberia parliamentary segment, the lack of unanimity in this choice has led to disgruntlement in the party.

While the leadership of the Trinamul Congress and CPI-M, having announced their nominees much earlier, have already hit the campaign trail, the Congress shows little sign of whirlwind electioneering in what had been a Trinamul stronghold in the previous parliamentary election.

Senior Congress leaders in the PCC and the Congress Legislature Party felt the party nominee’s lack of continued contact with the rank and file will be a deterrent in his campaign. Warsi had once been associated with Chhatra Parishad, but has little interaction with the party of late, it was pointed out.

The Congress nominnee’s background as a blogger and his expertise in management may have impressed the AICC leaders, but campaigners will find it to dificult to explain to the voters how he will be able to take up their concerns if he is elected, said a senior leader from Howrah where the Uluberaia parliamentary segment is located.

The choice of the candidate is also a reflection of the PCC chief’s failure to convince the AICC leadership of the unsuitablity of Warsi’s candidature, a senior CLP leader said.

Mr Chowdhury should have pointed out to the AICC members that a Congress nominee who has been away from the hurly burly of state politics for years will send a wrong message to the rank and file, he said. The delay in announcement and the choice of candidate will be another factor to stoke dissent against the PCC chief. Some of the leaders have voiced their resentment after he failed to stop the exodus of the party legislators to the Trinamul Congress.

The voices of protest have only become louder after the Congress nominee lost his deposit in the Sabang by-election in Midnapore (West) recently.

Lack of co-ordination and fund crunch have been identified to be the twin factors in this humiliating defeat in what had been a Congress stronghold for decades.

Against this backdrop, the choice of the nominee in the Uluberia by-election does not seem to indicate a determined bid to win the seat, a senior Congress leader from Howrah said.
On the other hand, it seems that our party is contesting this by-poll merely as a matter of form, he felt.

Four policemen killed in Kashmir IED explosion

Statesman News Service | Jammu |

Four policemen were killed and one was seriously injured on Saturday when an improvised explosive device (IED) was detonated by terrorists in the Sopore town of north Kashmir.

The IED exploded in the main bazaar where the Kashmir separatists had organised a shutdown against the killing of 57 people in 1993.

Police said that the IED was planted near a shop and was triggered when a police team reached there.

The killed policemen have been identified as Assistant Sub-Inspector Irshad Ahmad of Doda district, Mohammad Amin from Kupwara and Ghulam Rasool and Ghulam Nabi (both of Sopore). They were from the 3rd Battalion of the India Reserve Police (IRP).

Three shops were damaged due to the explosion. The security forces have cordoned off the area and launched a search operation

This is after several years that the terrorists in Kashmir have exploded an IED to cause casualties among the police personnel. They had been indulging in direct attacks with sophisticated weapons instead of IEDs.

Reports said that the terrorists had planted the IED in a shop in the congested lane between the Chhota Bazaar and Bada Bazaar. The policemen were patrolling the area in view of the separatists-sponsored shutdown. Expressing grief over the incident, Chief Minister Mehbooba Mufti tweeted; “Pained to hear that four policemen have been killed in an IED explosion in Sopore. My deepest condolences to their families”.

Former CM and National Conference leader, Omar Abdullah, in his tweet said; “Omar. Very sad news from #Sopore. May the four brave J&K police personnel killed in the line of duty today rest in peace”. Separatist Mirwaiz Umar Farooq in his tweet did not express condolences on killing of the 4 Kashmiri Muslim cops but accused “Indian forces” for massacre of 57 civilians 25 years ago.

S. Africa reach 65/2, take 142-run lead over India on Day 2

IANS | Cape Town |

South Africa reached 65 for two in their second innings after bowling India out for 209 in their first innings on the second day of the opening Test at Newlands here on Saturday.

The hosts have taken a lead of 142 runs as all-rounder Harik Pandya’s fighting knock of 93 lifted India out of the hole but that didn’t stop South Africa from getting a 77-run first-innings lead.

Hashim Amla (4 batting) and night-watchman Kagiso Rabada (2 batting) were at the crease when the umpires called it a day.

Earlier, Pandya (93) rekindled India’s hopes of a fightback with a classic counter-attacking half century but fell shy of seven runs to reach his second Test century.

Coming in at the fall of Ravichandran Ashwin when the Indians were tottering at 81/6, Pandya and Bhuvneshwar Kumar (25) forged a 99-run eighth-wicket stand to take India past 200-run mark.

For the Proteas, pacers Vernon Philander (3/33) and Kagiso Rabada (3/34) shared six wickets while Dale Steyn and Morne Morkel contributed with two scalps each.

Resuming the day on 28/3, Indian overnight batsmen Cheteshwar Pujara and Rohit Sharma (11) started cautiously watching every delivery closely to keep rotating strike.

Proteas skipper Faf du Plessis used his seamers well — rotating them to keep the visitors unsettled. The home team’s pace quartet maintained a good line and length asking constant questions to the opposition batsmen.

Rohit, who struggled to get going in his 59-ball innings, which contained a single boundary, was dismissed by a delivery from Rabada which struck him in front of the wicket. But the Mumbai batsman asked for a review and the decision was in favour of the bowler.

Following the dismissal, Ravichandran Ashwin (12), who was promoted up the order, joined Pujara to take India to 76/4 at lunch.

After the lunch session, both Ashwin and Pujara failed to get going from the onset.

Saurashtra batsman Pujara, who was batting with patience, was sent back by a Philander’s delivery which fetched an edge and was taken easily at second slip by skipper du Plessis.

Later, Ashwin (12) and Wriddhiman Saha (0) were also sent back to the pavilion in quick succession. While Ashwin was caught behind off Philander, Steyn got a lbw verdict against Saha as India reeled at 92/7.

However, the struggling Indian innings came to a recovery with a blistering innings from Pandya — who was tactically sent down the order. The Baroda right-hander hit 14 boundaries and one hit over the fence in his 95-ball innings.

Complimenting Pandya, Bhuvneshwar played a perfect second fiddle getting off the mark in the 32nd delivery he faced. The seamer presented full face of the bat, going on the defensive, allowing Pandya to go after the bowling.

The Proteas were seen to introduce their lone spinner Keshav Maharaj (0/15) for the first time in the second session.

The only trouble for the hosts came in form of their premier pacer Steyn — who was seen limping off the ground during the 61st over.

The hosts ended the partnership when Bhuvneshwar tried to cover drive Morkel, getting a thick edge which ended in the hands of de Kock, with India at 191/8.

Pandya fell soon, beaten by a delivery from Rabada that had extra bounce to deny him go over the slip cordon. De Kock took a regulation catch to ease the pressure on the hosts.

Rabada then snapped Jasprit Bumrah (2) to end the Indian first innings which ended at 209, with Mohammad Shami unbeaten on 4.

Pandya stole the show with the ball as well, removing both the South African opening batsmen Aiden Markram (34) and Dean Elgar (25).

Markram and Elgar put up a 52-run stand before the former pulled Pandya to the hands of Bhuvneshwar Kumar at mid-off.

Left-hander Elgar was settling nicely before edging an away moving delivery from Pandya to wicket-keeper Saha.

India pushed hard for the fall of night watchman Rabada towards the end but he managed to survice along with Amla as the hosts took a healthy lead going in to third day’s play.

Why Pakistan is mum on Yemen

Pervez Hoodbhoy |

As an occasional guest on one of the dime-a-dozen talk shows that Pakistanis watch avidly every evening, I remarked that Donald Trump’s announcement on Jerusalem was certainly condemnable. But shouldn’t Pakistanis be more concerned about the humanitarian catastrophe in Yemen — and Pakistan’s murky role in it? The other guest ‘experts’ froze and the anchorperson turned speechless; she subsequently called for a commercial break.

This is typical of how public discussion on Yemen is avoided. A glance at Pakistan’s TV channels and Urdu newspapers confirms the absence of news or critical discussion. While English language newspapers occasionally take a potshot, our obedient media generally echoes the civil and military establishment — which fully sides with fabulously rich Saudi Arabia against its desperately poor neighbour, Yemen.

Pakistan’s Foreign Office made its position perfectly clear on Dec 19. Just hours after Houthi rebels failed to target a royal palace in Riyadh, it rushed to offer congratulations: “The attack was successfully intercepted by the Saudi-led Coalition, by the grace of God Almighty, before it could cause any damage”.

The communique went on to condemn the “increasing frequency and ferocity of the missile strikes, targeted at innocent civilians by Houthi rebels” and declared that Pakistan stands “shoulder to shoulder” with Saudi Arabia.

Whether the credit actually goes to God Almighty or to Raytheon’s Patriot missile system — in which the Saudis have invested a few billion dollars — the fact is that primitive rebel rockets have done little damage to a country fortified by the US and UK defence industries. Yemen no longer has an air force or air defences left; Saudi-directed aircraft roam its skies at will.

In the last year, Yemen’s markets, schools, and hospitals have been bombed and famine is around the corner. Even sanitary systems have been destroyed and nearly a million cholera cases have been reported. According to the UN, at least 10,000 have died, with air strikes responsible for 60 per cent of casualties. Over 2.5 million Yemenis have been internally displaced.

We can be amazed by Theresa May criticising Saudi Arabia for using the £4.6bn worth of weapons Britain sold to it after the Yemen war began. And it’s almost unbelievable that Donald Trump had actually demanded that Saudi Arabia end its blockade of Hudaydah port. Even this vicious white supremacist does not relish starving Yemenis en masse. These might be pangs of guilt or perhaps a reluctant move to appease international opinion.

Trump and May are, at best, hypocrites. But what shall we say about Pakistan’s damning silence on Yemen’s grade-3 humanitarian catastrophe (Syria and South Sudan are also grade-3)? The Foreign Office has not condemned Saudi-led coalition airstrikes that have deliberately targeted food and water supplies, considered a crime under the Geneva Convention. Nor has it demanded an end to the food blockade. Only the threat to Saudi royal palaces and princes has mattered.

What explains Pakistan’s support? That puny Yemen somehow threatens Saudi territorial integrity, although a claim sanctimoniously repeated from time to time, is unbelievable. The Houthis are unknown to Pakistanis. While there is some vague belief that they are Shia, orthodox Shias refuse to accept them as their own. Back in the 1960s, Saudi forces backed the Zaydi Shias — now part of the Houthi rebel forces — against pan-Arab nationalists.

Most Pakistanis neither know nor care about Mansour Hadi, the recently murdered Ali Abdullah Saleh, or Yemen’s countless tribal rivalries. They also know that Saudi Arabia does not bomb countries for the sake of democracy or human rights. A kingdom that chops off heads and hands publicly every Friday has little use for either.

Pakistan supports Saudi hegemony simply because bags of riyals will buy you everything, including the allegiance of politicians and generals. The Sharif brothers have just returned from Madina, delighted at their ‘victory’ of being allowed to pay homage to the king. And, even if they are not directly involved in combat, thousands of soldiers of fortune — including Pakistan’s ex-hero general — are at the beck and call of Saudi rulers. Religion is used as convenient rhetoric but everyone knows how fake that is or pretends blindness.

Cash is really what speaks. Notwithstanding low oil prices, there’s still plenty floating around. Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman — the architect of the Yemen war — will soon become keeper of the Holy Places. He has just bought the world’s most expensive home, says The New York Times. The $392m Chateau Louis XIV near Versailles, France, is said to have the world’s best bar. It puts to shame the Surrey Palace or the Sharif properties in London. Salman also bought a 440-foot yacht — this $500m vessel has two pools and a helipad. His worthy daddy’s recent travels were with a 1,500-strong entourage, two Mercedes Benzes and 459 tons of luggage.

Those on our TV channels who daily rail against the United States for invading Iraq conveniently ignore that Saudi Arabia poured $20 billion into Iraq’s war against Iran, or the $40 billion dollop it gave to the Americans to chase Saddam Hussein out of Kuwait. But after Saudi Arabia’s muted response on the Jerusalem issue, parts of the Arab world are aflame. Posters displayed at a football match in Algeria depicted President Trump and King Salman as “two faces of the same coin”. After Trump’s Jerusalem declaration, Palestinian protesters in Gaza set fire to pictures of Trump, King Salman and Salman Jr.

Remaining a Saudi vassal state and siding with those who deliberately seek to starve Yemen’s children has degraded Pakistan’s moral status. Who will take Pakistan seriously when it talks of the plight of Kashmiris, Rohingyas, or Palestinians? Worship Mammon if you will and become mercenaries without conscience. But there’s a price to be paid.

The Yemen conflict is said to be a religious proxy war between Saudi Arabia and Iran. Maybe it is. Still, there is no reason for Pakistan to take sides. It must stay clear of a messy, bloody war that has no bearing on its security. It is time to bring our troops, retired or serving, back home from Saudi Arabia.

Reduced tensions vital for S Asia development

Bharat Dogra |

Name any indicator of human development, and you are likely to find the South Asian region somewhere at the bottom of it. While there can be many reasons for this, one important reason is the heavy direct and indirect expenditure on procuring and producing arms and ammunition. This trend seems to be escalating as various kinds of internal violence as well as tensions with neighboring countries lead to a growing feeling of insecurity, one that is whipped up by powerful forces to justify the increasing expenditure on arms at a time of shocking denial of basic needs.

The more insecure any nation feels, the more likely it is that its military expenditure will increase. But South Asia is a region where there is shocking deprivation in the context of basic health services and trained health personnel, under nutrition, malnutrition and even denial of clean drinking water to millions and millions of people. School education is still not available to millions of children.

Infact, South Asia is particularly vulnerable to poverty and deprivation as this region has 21 per cent of the world’s population but only three per cent of its land. In addition, a major part of this region suffered from colonial exploitation for nearly two centuries. Hence the need for concentration of attention and limited resources for removing or reducing poverty and deprivation is more acute here.

What is more this region has been identified by experts to be highly vulnerable to climate change and related threats. Due to this factor catastrophic disasters are likely to increase in the near future. Hence the need to devote more resources and efforts for climate change adaptation and mitigation is increasing all the time.

However, such priorities can be easily pushed aside when there is increasing threat perception about war and the entire discourse is mostly dominated by this. In this respect while Nepal and Sri Lanka have done well to move away from civil war type conditions (although several problems remain) tensions and hostilities between India and Pakistan have been escalating with worrying regularity.

While actual war is likely to be unbearably costly in terms of human life, even increasing threat perception can be very costly by removing resources from bread to guns. According to data given by the South Asian Human Development Report, the cost of one tank equals expenses of vaccination of four million children, the cost of one Mirage 2000-5 airplane equals one year’s primary education expenses of three million children, the cost of one submarine equals the cost of providing clean drinking water to 60 million people for one year. (See chart below).

A report by Amnesty International and other social organizations titled Guns or Growth says that escalating military expenditure can be particularly harmful when it takes the form of an arms race. This report says, “The cumulative impact of arms spending is also a cause for concern, particularly in the context of arms races. Research shows that states respond in kind to military spending by the neighbors-even non-hostile ones. Arms races in the context of developing countries can have particularly severe consequences for government spending allocations.” In fact, in the context of South Asia the costs of the arms race are actually much higher than what is revealed by the official arms data as many aspects of this expenditure remain hidden to a lesser or greater extent. In a region which has two nuclear weapon armed countries, many aspects of the development, maintenance and research of such weapons remain hidden.

Clearly the welfare of the people of South Asia is very closely tied up with the establishment of peace so that on the one hand the most terrible distress linked with actual war is entirely avoided and at the same time the possibility of heavy arms expenditure is greatly reduced. South Asia needs a strong peace movement which functions with continuity on several fronts, one of which is to reduce the expenditure on arms and ammunition so that more funds become available for essential development and welfare needs. Not just the official arms budget but also the huge purchases of arms and ammunition by various persons, groups, militias and mafias need to be curbed strictly.

Aging with Dignity

Anupriyo Mallick |

There are 87.6 million people in India aged above 60, a fact that deserves the attention of a nation almost obsessed with its ‘demographic dividend’. Considering that the country is expected to be home to 300 million elderly people by 2050, it is time to reflect on the problems of those who are as old, or even older, than the independent nation itself. Otherwise, the country will be confronted with an increasing incidence of degenerative diseases, accompanied with serious gaps in the geriatric medical ecosystem, a changing joint family structure, the lack of ‘grey-friendliness’ in public spaces, transport, housing, and a virtually non-existent policy framework to tackle these issues.

With nearly 50 per cent of the elderly being financially dependent on others, it is affordable housing, healthcare, and the psychological and social manifestations of ageing that will call for a response not least because there is little or no social security. Facilities for old-age care are woefully inadequate. What could the combined impact of this trend be on small, nuclear families, given the improvement in lifestyles and an increase in degenerative diseases and life-spans, especially for women? Where are we going to live as we grow old and who is going to take care of us?
Clearly Parliament had some of these issues in mind when it passed the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act in 2007. The model Act makes it obligatory for children or relatives to provide maintenance to senior citizens and parents. It also provides for the setting up of old age homes by state governments. Despite this, however, it is a fact that most people in India would rather suffer than have the family name tarnished by taking their own children to court for not taking care of them. The need to maintain a façade is combined with a lack of knowledge of rights, the inherent inability of the elderly to approach a tribunal for recourse under the law, and poor implementation of the Act by various State governments.

So what happens to those who have been turned out from their homes, or have lost their spouse, or just can’t manage to live on their own any more, especially since the number of old-age homes the Centre supports under the Integrated Programme for Older Persons (IPOP) has declined from 269 in 2012-13 to a dismal 137 in 2014-15? The Centre has asked State governments to ensure that there are old-age homes whose functioning can be supported under IPOP, but since it is optional for the State governments to do so, the total number of old-age homes remains abysmally low.
While we hope that the Indian family continues to be stronger than in most countries and provides a caring environment for the elderly, it can’t be the basis for our ability to support the elderly. India needs to take a serious look at the needs of the elderly in a more pragmatic and holistic manner. For starters it could focus on the three key aspects of health, housing, and dignity.
Each of these is a large issue on its own, but it is important to first strengthen the health-care system. If 18 per cent of the population is going to be over 60 years of age by 2050, then it becomes almost crucial to encourage research in geriatric diseases, and push for building capacity in the geriatric departments across the primary and tertiary health-care systems. There also seems to be a growing informal industry of home care providers, which urgently needs regulation and mandated guidelines so that a large pool of certified and affordable trained home care givers can help provide basic support, prevent unnecessary hospital admissions, and keep the elderly in the familiar environs of their homes as far as possible.

There has to be a network of old-age homes, both in the private and public sectors. While the private sector has taken the lead in setting up some state-of-the-art facilities, most of these are priced well out of the reach of ordinary citizens. The State governments must be mandated to set up quality, affordable homes.

As traditionally supportive social structures are changing and the elderly are increasingly losing their ‘status’ as the family patriarchs, it is time that we did our bit to help address the indignities and loneliness that this change is bringing about. Business enterprises can consider harnessing the talent of elders by retaining or hiring older workers and offering flexible working hours for those who want to continue working after retirement.

Industry will benefit by retaining their knowledge and experience and the elderly will continue to be financially independent and retain their sense of self-worth. At the community level we also need to increase the avenues for older people to participate in local issues, in resident associations, set up and manage spaces for community interaction, to leverage their experience as a resource, give them an opportunity to share their concerns, and help them feel that they contribute socially and have a purpose in life.

One major issue that doesn’t get enough attention today is that old people deserve dignity. Apart from ensuring appropriate medical help, there needs to be greater awareness about common degenerative diseases like dementia so that family members, care-givers, and society at large are sensitised to incontinence, the momentary lack of comprehension, the hallucinations. These are the painful behavioural, physical, emotional and mental struggles of those who suffer from these diseases.

We seldom give much thought, at last when we are young, to growing old but it may be surprising to learn that of the many physiological effects of ageing occur much earlier than you might imagine. However, at some point we begin to see and feel the effects of changes, such as wrinkles and grey hair, and some degree of physical decline, for example, aches and pains, issues pertaining to weight, diabetes, high blood pressure and cardio-vascular problems. Indeed, old-age can affect every aspect of our lives ~ physical, physiological, mental and emotional.

Ageing is a life-long process and taking proper care of ourselves and making healthy lifestyle choices at every stage can go a long way towards helping us live longer and reducing the risk of disability.

The writer is with Eastern Institute for Integrated Learning in Management(EIILM), Kolkata.

Towards breakthrough?

Editorial |

The forward movement on either side of the Demilitarised Zone is without question a hopeful start to the New Year. Three days after South Korea’s overture to hold talks with the North, Pyongyang has conveyed its willingness to join at the high table. Quite a change from the usual belligerence of the likes of Kim Jong-un, and the world will now expect the North Korean leader to hold his fire not least in the context of the international concern over the ballistic missile and other alarmist programmes. Appropriately enough, the talks will be held in Peace House, so-called, on the South Korean side of Panmunjom. Yet going by the contours of the agenda, the North’s game-theory might turn out to be of relatively lesser moment in the overall construct.

Discussions at the high table will be riveted to Pyongyang’s possible participation in next month’s Winter Olympics in the South Korean town of Pyeongchang. Beyond the event, it is direly imperative to improve overall ties after a year in which North Korea has raised tensions in the region with a series of missile launches and its sixth ~ and most powerful ~ nuclear test. It would be no exaggerration to suggest that North Korea has cast a nuclear shadow over Asia’s 2018. There is little doubt that Seoul’s overture and its prompt acceptance have followed Donald Trump’s decision to keep the military exercise, in league with South Korea, in abeyance before next month’s games. The US President and his South Korean ally, Moon Jae-in, agreed on Thursday night that the large-scale drills should be held after the Games. Markedly, the North’s concurrence has followed the postponement. Pyongyang regards the joint military exercises as a rehearsal for invasion and has often cited them as an impediment to any attempt to mend fences with the South.

Speculation that the Koreas would resume face-to-face contacts rose on New Year’s Day, when President Kim said he was willing to discuss the possibility of sending athletes to Pyeongchang. That was followed by a South Korean offer of talks and the resumption on Wednesday of a cross-border telephone hotline that had not been used since early 2016. Kim’s overture, however, came with a warning that Pyongyang would continue to develop nuclear weapons to counter threats by the US.

His claim that the nuclear button was “on my desk” had provoked President Trump to counter that his nuclear button was “bigger” and more effective, resuming the war of words between the two leaders that began last year with an exchange of personal insults. Such US insults have now gone beyond Pyongyang… to Pakistan and Palestine. Both the North and the South are inching towards a critical juncture and the world must hope that this is an essay towards an enduring breakthrough.

Film beyond argument

Editorial |

It would be reasonable to assume in the New Year that cinema is safe. With a vowel expected to end the controversy that was ignited recently, it is generally expected that Padmavat will be released sooner rather than later. No less critically, the curtain ought also to go up on the celluloid version of The Argumentative Indian, Suman Ghosh’s documentary embedded in Amartya Sen’s book of the same name. It is immensely gratifying to reflect that the film can now be screened across the country and without cuts thanks to the clearance that has now been accorded by the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC), notably the very rational intervention of the present chairman, Prasoon Joshi.

One must give it to the board that it has eventually taken the film beyond any argument. Sad to reflect that both films reaffirm how the political/ideological underpinning can shroud cinema in a fog of uncertainty. It would be pertinent to recall that The Argumentative Indian was confined to the cans six months ago when the CBFC took umbrage to two expressions used by Sen and no less ~ “cow’’ and “Gujarat”. Both words, regretfully at the root of recent killings and a pogrom, had been ordered to be “beeped out” by the previous chairman… along with the words, “Hindu India” and “Hindutva view of India”.

Sen had been filmed saying: “Why democracy works so well is that the government is not free to have its own stupidities and, in case of Gujarat, its own criminalities, without the opposition being howled down and booted out”.

Happily, the 60-minute documentary will now be screened without being bowdlerised ~ Thursday’s horribly belated decision over which the film-maker is said to be “relieved as well as pleasantly surprised”. Sure the performing arts are open to subjective reflection. Appropriately, therefore, the viewer ought to be free to draw his conclusions on the documentary, indeed to spell the difference between the film and the book that didn’t trigger even a scintilla of controversy.

There has been a remarkable change in perceptions from one person to another. While Pahlaj Nihalani had barred the film, Mr Joshi is said to have “loved the documentary that kept him
completely engrossed”. Indeed, he has been quoted as saying that he “got to learn a lot about Amartya Sen”. Markedly, he did not find anything objectionable and has cleared the documentary without cuts. Crucially, Mr Joshi has overruled the objections, articulated last July, restoring ~ at any rate for now ~ the CBFC’s faith in the freedom of expression. It would be no promotion of the film to suggest that it richly deserves the U/A certificate; only to underline the rational imperative. And there is a parable to be drawn from the controversy ~ the political climate ought never to influence cinema.

The one that got away

M Krishnan |

We were returning from a long and singularly luckless outing in the jungle on elephant-back, and had almost reached the road to the rest house. There was a wide patch of lantana and tall grass between us and the road, with a flat-topped rock to one side of it, and the leopard lay stretched at ease atop the rock, watching us.

We were too far away to see the markings on its coat, and it lay so still and grey that, but for the twitching forward of its ears and the slow turn of its head the better to observe us, we would have missed it altogether, and thought it only a part of the rock even if we had seen it. I had the elephant moved away into the scrub at once, so that our backs were to the watcher, and cautioned everyone not to turn and look at it.

When we were well past the rock, I held a brief, whispered conference with the mahout. Some years ago this man and I had had a rather terrifying experience with a large male leopard and I pointed out to him that this was a much smaller animal, very much at ease and therefore unlikely to go for us, and that even if it turned aggressive, I would be nearer the leopard than he, and that he could rely on me in a crisis-a thing which I had already once proved to him. He looked at me with a contemptuous expression on his face and asked: “who’s afraid of this cat?”
We moved round towards the rock again, zigzagging in a seemingly aimless, but carefully studied, approach. When we were still some 60 yards away, and the leopard was obscured by lantana branchlets, I took a few pictures to accustom it to the thud of my shutter, taking care not to look at it directly, but only through my reflex camera. It seemed utterly self-possessed, and not the least bit worried by our halting, slow approach.

I was sure that if we went slowly, took care not to look at it directly, and made no jerky movement or sound, I could take a clear picture of the leopard from under 25 yards with my lens more or less on a level with the rock. The light was ideal.

It was a smallish leopard, remarkably richly coloured, with the black rosettes clear against the golden sienna of its coat, and a shapely, beautifully-set head-a leopardess, evidently, and probably under 85 lb. With each casually-gained foot, I felt a growing excitement, but had the sense to suppress it and go very slow. Only two more yards to gain, and the last lantana twig would be clear of the leopard, which was in no way alarmed by our proximity.

Then suddenly our elephant began to dance a jig. Luckily I was able to retain my precarious seat, right on the front edge of the pad, by grabbing a rope with my right hand, while holding on grimly to the 10 lb camera with my left. I pressed my shoulder against the mahout, and whispered fiercely into his ear to halt the elephant. Out mount continued to twist and turn and fidget, and out of the tail of my eye I saw the leopard prick its ears and slightly elevate its head, the first sign of alertness it had shown so far. A frown creased its forehead as it watched the extraordinary performance we were staging right in front of it.

Then it rose unhurriedly to its feet, lazily stretched itself fore and aft with a fluid, see-sawing movement of superlative grace, and slid softly into the tall grass beneath the rock and disappeared.
It was useless blaming the mahout. It was the sudden fear in his mind that had fled down his legs and caused him to make the elephant dance jerkily with a series of quick, disjointed kicks. No doubt the recollection of our old misadventure had unnerved him, but there was no point in asking him to rally himself-a man in a panic does not become calm and steady all at once by being asked to pull himself together, and I have felt sudden fear too often myself when close to wild animals to blame another for the feeling.

In fact, I write this merely to tell you how self-possessed that leopardess was throughout, and how narrowly I missed the first clear chance I have had of photographing a wild leopard from near enough to get a really good picture. And perhaps it is the photographer’s equivalent of the tendency of anglers to dwell on the one that got away that moves me to retail this incident in such regretful detail!

A closer look at ‘xenotransplantation’

Maneka Gandhi |

The first known xenotransplantation was done by the god Shiva. Daksha, the father in law of Shiva, organised a yagna. He insulted Shiva and his daughter. Sati, Shiva’s wife, immolated herself in protest. Daksha’s head was cut off and burnt. Later, when Shiva forgave him, he was brought back to life but with a ram’s head. The more famous decapitation was that of Ganesha. Shiva cut off the head of a baby elephant and transplanted it on to his son’s neck.

For the last 300 years doctors have been trying to replicate this miracle. The process is called xenotransplantation, or the transplanting of non-human organs or cells into a human body.
Thousands of animals have died in the process. And each attempt has been a failure. But that doesn’t stop scientists from trying. After all, animal life is cheap and, in the name of science, one can do anything.

In the 17th century, Jean Baptiste Denis started the practice of blood transfusion from animals to humans. Everyone died and xenotransfusion was banned in France for a number of years. In the 19th century, skin grafts became relatively popular between various animal species and humans. The fact that many of the species used as donors-sheep, rabbits, dogs, cats, rats, chickens, and pigeons-had hair, feathers, or fur, growing from the skin, did not deter the surgeons involved. The ideal graft was from frogs, which were sometimes skinned alive. None of the grafts were successful.

In the 20th century, the French experimental surgeon, Alexis Carrel, developed surgical techniques for joining blood vessels, which enabled organ transplantation to be carried out successfully for the first time. For this work he was awarded the Nobel Prize in 1912. He developed an interest in cross-species transplantation and his techniques became a reason for more people to experiment on animals.

A few years later, Serge Voronoff , a Russian émigré working in Paris, developed an interest in reversing the effects of aging in elderly men who had lost their “zest for life.” He sliced a large number of chimpanzee or baboon testicles and implanted them in the testicles of old men. None of them had any effect. In fact they created infections and more complications. The concept of transplanting glandular tissue to produce hormones that would benefit the recipient was continued in the United States by John Brinkley, whose chosen donor was the goat, as he had been convinced by a local farmer of its sexual potency. He was later disbarred by the American Medical Association.

In the 1960s, Keith Reemtsma at Tulane University in Louisiana-hypothesised that non-human primate kidneys might function in human recipients and thus be a successful treatment for renal failure. By then kidney transplantation from human to human had been established (in the 50s), but the availability of kidneys from deceased humans was extremely limited. Reemtsma selected the chimpanzee as the source of organs, because of its close evolutionary relationship to humans. He carried out 13 of these transplants. While all the chimpanzees died in great pain the experiments failed. One woman lasted 9 months but spent all that time strapped to a bed and hospital catheters. In another experiment scientists transplanted a pig kidney into a baboon. The baboon died in 5 months.

But the scientists carried on with kidney transplants. Tom Starzl used baboons as donors in Colorado. His results were similar to those of Reemtsma.
James Hardy, in 1964, tried to transplant a chimpanzee heart into a patient who had undergone amputations of both legs-and was in a semi-comatose state at the time the transplant was undertaken. The patient died within a few hours. The chimpanzee, of course, had been killed. In 1967 Christian Bernard also carried out two cardiac xenotransplants. Both failed. Perhaps the best known clinical cardiac xenotransplantation since Hardy’s attempt was that by Leonard Bailey, who transplanted a baboon heart into an infant girl, known as Baby Fae, in 1983. The graft underwent acute rejection and the patient died 20 days later. One of the reasons, which would appear common sense to an average, non medical person, is that baboons don’t have O blood type, which is donor blood. They have ABO which is incompatible with humans.

Tom Starzl, who is considered one of the pioneers in the field of kidney and liver human to human transplantation, performed a handful of liver transplants between non-human primates and young patients in Colorado in the 1960s, with no success. As more immuno-suppressants became available, he performed two liver transplants from baboons into adult patients in the 1990s, with no survivors.

In the meantime xenotransplantation of pig islet transplantation is under way in diabetic patients in New Zealand. A European group has given rhesus monkeys an artificially induced Parkinson like motor disease and is experimenting with genetically modified pig dopamine-producing cells from pig embryos into the monkey brain, so that this can eventually be done with people with Parkinson’s. No luck so far, but there is no shortage of monkeys being imported from Mauritius.

The people of Asia and Africa need new corneas. Experimental corneal xenotransplantation is being done; like transplanting pig corneas into monkey eyes. The recipient needs corticosteroid injections into the eyes for the rest of his life – if the 4 experiments work which they have not done so far. Nebraska Medical Center, is transplanting hearts from pigs into sheep. Pig xenotransplants of heart, kidneys, lungs and livers, into apes carries on. The results? Completely unsuccessful. Does that stop the scientists? Not yet. Clinics in Europe tout the efficacy of various animal tissues from placentas to blood cells, plasma and organs for a variety of conditions – from acne to anti-aging. There is no evidence that they work.

The pig is now the creature that is being focused on. Why? Its genetic makeup is completely different from that of a human being. But the reasons are far more commercial. Its organs are the same size as humans, it is cheap to maintain and it has three litters a year, so pigs can be easily available. Does this make any scientific sense. No. But by the time they give up, xenotranplantation companies will have tortured and killed millions of pigs.

In 1969, Nobel Prize winner Sir Peter Medawar, who is considered the father of transplant immunology, stated, “We should solve the problem of organ transplantation by using xenografts in less than 15 years.” It is now 2017 and we are no closer. Norman Shumway, the pioneer of heart transplantation, stated truthfully “xenotransplantation is the future of transplantation, and always
will be.”

The scientists are going to keep trying. They get paid for their research and, if they do succeed in producing usable organs from pigs, then there is a Nobel Prize at the end of the rainbow. Who cares about the animals?

The conversation

Haimanti Dutta Ray |

The house reeked of an amalgam of masala powders, expensive cosmetics and mingled perfumes from flowers like the Indian jasmine and marigolds. Piya’s parents had made every arrangement in order to make their only daughter’s wedding as memorable and joyous as possible.

“Who will grind the turmeric paste?”
The bride’s mother could be heard hollering at the maids — some of the girls were working in the household for as long as memory could travel while some had been hired from a local “service centre”. Of late, they had been doing brisk business owing to the dearth in the need for full-time domestic helps.

“None of you will get your wages until the work is done to my satisfaction.”

Sunayini Mitra’s voice was enough to start up the human engines again. Those maids had been working round the clock as it was an occasion for the most elaborate of all celebrations. Bireshwar and Sunayini Mitra’s daughter, the lovely Piya, was getting married to the scion from the family whose origins took them back to Raja Rammohan Roy.

Kanishka was as handsome as any girl could ever dream about or for that matter, any boy could aspire to become. Soft-spoken, with a deliberately accentuated drawl, which showed off his Oxford University education, he was the quintessential gentleman. Medium in stature and dark in complexion, his attire was always impeccably British. Kanishka had just returned from the UK after having done his Masters in anthropology. Despite living there for close to five years, he was a true Bengali at heart. He could recite Tagore as well as converse in the diction with ease and finesse. He liked Piya as soon as he, along with his parents, visited their place after an invitation.

“Have you ever been to England?”
Kanishka had asked Piya as soon as the elders had left them alone to have some private chat. Growing up in the northern fringes of Kolkata with its big portico houses and never ending staircases, he always used to consider that the southern parts boasted of people with very “liberal” mindsets. Until the time he went abroad for further studies.

He wanted to be frank with Piya. This he had decided before even he had stepped into their house. He wanted to tell her that despite having a few emotional entanglements there, it’d ultimately be the Indian, more particularly a Bengali, girl who’d rule his home and heart.

“No. Never.”
Piya had answered back, with her head lowered as all Indian girls are expected to do, well aware that her friends and cousins were putting their ears surreptitiously behind the curtains.
“Would you like to accompany me?”

For the very first time, Piya experienced an inner turmoil she had never felt before. She had overheard from her parents’ conversation that Kanishka’s parents had asked for a hefty lump sum as dowry as part of the marriage settlement.
***
“You would hardly understand what the times are, sitting as you do all day long within the confines of these four walls.”
Piya’s father was raising a hand over all protestations from her mother’s side. “Don’t you know that asking for dowry is punishable by law and we can place these people behind bars? You know, don’t you, that she is our only daughter?” Piya’s mother, the otherwise docile and submissive homemaker, was speaking with marked anger in her voice. She added further, “Just look at you! With what calm and serenity you are accepting this outrage of our daughter’s modesty. If I had not heard you speaking for women’s empowerment in seminars, I would have never believed that you had double standards.”

“But the groom is one in a million. How could I refuse them? Moreover what they are asking for, comes within our capabilities.”
“The question is not whether we can afford to pay.”
***
Piya had overheard the conversation between her parents a few days back. She had wondered at the courage, which her mother, quite understandably, had mustered to speak up against the patriarch of their household. A characteristic, which she knows, had never been exhibited before.

Piya was a petite girl of 23 — an age, which is considered opportune for girls to get married in most Bengali households. She was fair, with glowing skin and lustrous hair. The latter often tied up in a little ponytail. She was learning Hindustani classical music and studying chemistry at Ashutosh College.

Piya was sincere about her music. A few days ago, she had won the first prize at an inter-college singing competition. Her mornings always started with an hour of riyaz and only then did she sit with her college notes.

She knew that Kanishka was a good student and would eventually make a good husband as well. So she said “yes” when asked by her parents whether she liked the boy.
***
When the wedding bells eventually rang for Piya, the entire household was jubilant.
“Look at her! All beaming and blushing! You’ll make a wonderful new bride, Piya,” their neighbour, Arundhati mashi, who had come over to supervise proceedings, said.
“Can I have a word with your daughter, Mr Mitra?”

Kanishka’s father had come over to put the seal, as if it was a contract of some sort, over his son’s wedding arrangements. That his son was left besotted by their daughter’s looks as well as her demeanour was not unknown to him.
“Yes?”
Piya’s father had welcomed his would-be son-in-law’s father with open arms and a heart full of happiness for their only daughter, soon to step into a new stage in her life.
“I would like to have a word with your daughter, you see, in seclusion. I hope you’ll grant this wish of mine.”
“But….? Everything has been finalised, you know.”
“But I insist on my request. Consider it to be one of my whims.”
Piya’s father shouted, turning his back to his sudden and whimsical guest. “Call Piya right now.”
***
When the two, the prospective bride and her would-be father-in-law, were left alone and the former had made sure that there’d be no one to prick a needle into the private conversation, Kanishka’s father began, “You’re soon to be a part of our household. You cannot imagine how happy we are. But I’d like to ask you, a question personally. Have you given consent by your own free will or has there been pressure from your parents? Reply after giving it serious thought.”
Piya sat with her head lowered for a couple of minutes.

Only after she was certain that she could withstand the piercing eyes from a person who considered that every girl has a right to say her views regarding her choice of life partners, did Piya say, “Baba, Ma have pressurised me to accept the marriage proposal. But frankly, I want to study further and am confident that I’d be able to choose my husband with my own abilities, not relying on my parents’ bank balance.”

Piya thought that she had uttered the unutterable, considering all the arrangements had been made from both ends. But what she hadn’t expected was the uproarious laughter that emanated from the person confronting her.

“Bravo!”
At first Piya was left speechless. She felt that, in the first place, she had made an outrageous statement and in the second, it had decidedly struck her that her would-be father-in-law might be mad.
“This is what I wanted to see in my future daughter-in-law.” Kanishka’s father had stood up from his seat and was standing, with a beaming look spread all over his otherwise dark countenance.
“Bravo!” He repeated. “I had wanted to see for myself whether you’re as intelligent as Kanishka, my son, has promised you to be. I appreciate and respect your views and frankly, find it hard to annul the arrangements at this eleventh hour. I would plead you to agree to become my somewhat-eligible son’s lawfully wedded wife.”

Piya had hardly expected this reaction. She had thought that she’d been able to douse the man’s ego. But what she got was an ounce of affection, which bowled her over.
“I would be immensely happy and would consider myself fortunate if you decide to pursue your studies after the wedding. I’d see to it myself that you face no hurdle in finding financial independence, at least from my household. I’d be too proud of you if you accept me as your father-in-law and my son however, he may have behaved with you, as your life companion.”
The man meant what he said.

Piya smiled and this was about all Kanishka’s father had wanted to notice. He knew that this girl’s “No” as an answer to this private conversation could jeopardise the entire wedding. But what’s more he was left impressed by Piya’s views and was obviously glad that his son had selected this girl before anyone else did.

Bonding with Bond

Krishnan Srinivasan |

Ruskin Bond according to the publisher’s jacket cover is “one of India’s greatest writers.” Born in 1934, he has written “over 100 books of fiction, non-fiction and poetry,” and was awarded the Padma Bhushan in 2014. I confess to reading none of the hundred books and I felt it better to begin with this autobiography, with an open mind, following the advice of the greatest literary critic of all time, Charles Saint-Beuve, who wrote “you judge the tree by its fruits.”

“No life is more, or less, important than another…It is the story of a small man,” writes Bond appealingly, though he is undoubtedly a considerable Indian celebrity. He has the remarkable ability to recall accurate memories from a very early age, and remembers details even form the age of five, and the names of his preparatory school teachers.

It is hard to deny he seems to have been disagreeable if not obnoxious as a child. Obviously spoilt by a doting father, he was self-obsessed. Studying in two boarding schools in hill stations in India from the age of six till class X, he had a confrontational attitude to teachers, and gives them little merit for his education. Only Mr Jones, a Welshman with literary tastes, is credited with some influence on Bond wishing to be a writer.

His devoted father died of hepatitis at age of 46 when Bond was 10, but he and Bond’s mother, who was Anglo-Indian and was what would then be called “flighty”, had separated before that. In fact Bond suspects there might not have been a marriage at all, and he was born out of wedlock. His mother subsequently married an Indian Hindu, always described for some reason as “Mr H”. Apart from the father, Bond is severe on all his other relatives. “I made no effort to be close to them, or to my brothers”. He had one brother and one sister, and two half-brothers and one half-sister.

Bond’s account of English and Anglo-Indians who stayed on in India in near-penury is the most interesting and poignant part of the book, though not central to the narrative. Bond had a lonely childhood, a broken home and boarding schools he did not like. Sent to a maternal aunt, he was in England from age 17 to 21, first in Jersey and then London. This was a period of “four years of dreary office work” and loneliness and homesickness for India, but also his highly-rated first book, an autobiographical story published by Andre Deutsch, before Bond was 23.

The author returned to India which to him was “a land of acceptance”; the “intimacy of human contact” was what he missed in England. “I wanted the freedom of being my very own person.” He is attracted by loners without prospects; a village boy sleeping with a flute by his side, on another occasion by “a boy huddled in a recess, a think shawl wrapped around his shoulders.”

From age 25 to 29 he stayed in Delhi. At 29, he moved to Mussoorie, welcoming the solitude, the surrounding nature, and leisure. By page 200 and over 2/3rds of the way through the book, Bond is still only 25. At page 243 and thirty pages form the end, he is only 30. The narrative therefore is heavily tilted towards his early years, and ends at page 258 because the rest of the book is episodic. He provides no context of the Indian societal/political scene for his life and work, and except for fleeting mentions of Partition, Gandhi’s assassination and the Emergency; other events seem to have had no impact on his life.

He achieved financial security only in the late 1990s, when he was in his 60s. He does not use a computer or cell phone but says nothing about his methodology or technique for writing. He describes himself as celibate but not as virginal. He now makes his home at Landour above Mussoorie with the descendants, to whom the book is dedicated, of his one-time cook.

He is at times self-deprecating but with the ring of truth — “Some people get by on their charm and their wits. Not having much of either..” and goes on to say that “bachelors and kittens are suitable objects for compassion.” He himself, however, displays no sign of compassion whatever even for his handicapped sister “neither child nor adult” whose mind “would remain that of a five-year-old,” who was unable to see or walk properly and died at the age of 78 apparently without any support from the celebrated author. Both half-brothers died in traffic accidents. There are no generous words of gratitude for those who helped him in his days of struggle — not even for people who lent him money or his first editor, the remarkable Diana Athill. Nor is there any praise for any contemporary writer, and he must have known many of them personally.

Bond’s few efforts at humour fall flat and the book lacks an index. Perhaps an admirer of his books would be pre-disposed to affection for the author’s autobiography and sympathy for his early struggles. But for a newcomer to Bond’s work , the author seems to take satisfaction, or at least lack of remorse, in his failings and especially his callousness.
The closer the family relationship with Bond, it would appear, the greater his alienation, always excepting his father. Does reading this book draw the reader to the author’s many works? Not
necessarily.

Master of the mysterious

Manas Das |

To capture the spirit of our turbulent times in their myriad manifestations, we can hardly miss reading the works of Ian McEwan, who has been a major voice in contemporary British fiction since his first collection of stories, First Love, Last Rites, which won the Somerset Maugham Award in 1976.

He is often called the finest writer of his generation which includes Martin Amis, Julian Barnes, Angela Carter, Salman Rushdie, and Kazuo Ishiguro. In 2008 The Times featured him on their list of the 50 greatest writers since 1945 and The Daily Telegraph ranked him number 19 on their list of the 100 most powerful people in British culture.

Few people can string together words as beautifully as McEwan. When one reads an Ian McEwan novel, one can almost hear the pauses in the clacking of his keyboard as he comes up with a beautiful idea and a beautiful way to put it to paper. To get a real feel of our times and of McEwan’s writing, we can resort to his latest novel Nutshell where the narrator is extremely unusual, a male foetus in its third trimester who overhears plans for a murder. His mother Trudy is sleeping with his uncle Claude and they are planning to kill his father. The plot resembles Shakespeare’s Hamlet, until halfway through, after the murder is committed and Trudy feels remorse, when she starts quoting Macbeth.

The plot also reminds one of Abhimanyu. Locked inside his mother’s womb — as one version of Mahabharata story runs — Abhimanyu overhears his father Arjuna discussing a well-known battle strategy with his wife. It involves a military formation called the “disk” — a murderous rank of enemy soldiers forms around a warrior in a perfect spiral, and seven steps, carried out in precise sequence, can penetrate that deadly labyrinth, permitting escape. Abhimanyu listens intently — at times, the thumping drone of his mother’s aorta next to his tiny ear is near-deafening. But as Arjuna speaks, his mother dozes off to sleep. The conversation stops. The final route of escape — the seventh step — is left unmentioned.

The idea for the extremely unusual narrator of Nutshell first came to him while he was chatting with his pregnant daughter-in-law,“We were talking about the baby, and I was very much aware of the baby as a presence in the room”, McEwan reminisces. He scribbled a few notes, and soon afterwards, daydreaming in a long meeting, the first sentence of the novel popped into his head, “So here I am, upside down in a woman”.

McEwan has written novels, screenplays, children’s stories, and a libretto for an oratorio on the topic of nuclear annihilation. His subject matter is as varied as his choice of genre, alternating between sadomasochism (which earned him early in his career the title of “Ian MacAbre”) and feminism, between historical fiction and contemporary psychological intrigue. But there is a distinctive element in his works. His writing has been called “the art of unease”, an apt term for the discomfort and disquiet his works invoke.

In The Child in Time, McEwan’s protagonist realises that his marriage ended, as “there had been a malevolent intervention”. McEwan’s works brilliantly portray “malevolent interventions” — child snatchings, hot-air balloon disasters, and car crashes. His characters’ attempts to make sense of such incidents and to regain or to maintain some kind of security in the incidents’ aftermath often motivate his plots. The novels’ occasional failures to coalesce into more than distinct set pieces may say less about McEwan’s skill in plotting than about his reluctance to give coherence to a world that he says “distresses me and makes me anxious”. He made his name as a writer of dark short stories in which disturbing subject matter (incest, murder and violence) is rendered in stark, unemotional prose.

For example, in Homemade, an adolescent boy rapes his ten-year-old sister and is proud of the act, while Dead as they come describes a man’s erotic obsession with a store mannequin. McEwan’s later works widen their scope, taking on political topics (government propaganda, patriarchy, terrorism) and a greater cast of characters and historical time periods.

What Kiernan Ryan has sceptically called the “received wisdom” about McEwan’s career is that he began as a “writer obsessed with the perverse, the grotesque, the macabre”, but grew out of this adolescent style of writing “to a more mature engagement with the wider world of history and society”. But this easy division fails to account for important continuities of McEwan’s work, overstating the sensationalism of the earlier stories while underestimating the eroticism and perverse power games still at large in the later works.

Ian Russell McEwan was born on 21 June 1948 in Aldershot, Hampshire, though he spent much of his childhood abroad, in Singapore and in Libya, where his father, a Scottish sergeant major in the British Army, was stationed. McEwan has said that he was mentally an only child, since his stepsiblings were a decade older than he, and his early stories and his first novel, The Cement Garden (1978), seem fascinated by potential sibling relationship.

The Cement Garden has been described as a modern Lord of the Flies, wherein four siblings, recently bereft of both parents, first bury their mother’s body in cement in the basement, and then unsuccessfully attempt to reconstruct a “normal” family life. Another element of his childhood that reverberates thematically throughout their works was his experience of being gathered for safety into armed military camps when Britain and France invaded Egypt over the Suez Canal in 1956. He has remarked that his childhood realisation that political changes intimately affect individuals’ experiences underscores the political engagement in his works.

McEwan earned his Master’s from the University of East Anglia under the auspices of two famous literary figures, Malcolm Bradbury and Angus Wilson. Stories from his thesis became his acclaimed first collection First Love, Last Rites. By 1983, having published another collection of stories and two novels, he was named one of the Twenty Best Young British Novelists by Granta.
Meanwhile, McEwan felt the need of rising above the label of being “the chronicler of comically exaggerated psychopathic states of mind or of adolescent anxiety, snot and pimples”. The difference between The Comfort of Strangers (1981) and The Child in Time (1987) seems to be a thematic watermark in McEwan’s oeuvre. While The Comfort, reminiscent of Thomas Mann’s Death in Venice, is a horrifying tale, examining a young couple’s boredom while on holiday until they meet two strangers.

The strangest characteristic of this dark tale may be the young couple’s apparent complicity in their doom, the similarity between their erotic rejuvenation and the fatal “comfort” provided by their new psychopathic friends.

The Child in Time turns away from this earlier Gothicism, and although the tale presents the regression of an aspiring statesman to childhood, this regression is beautiful, as the man carefully builds his tree house, and begins to live like a boy. McEwan’s other works of this middle period include The Innocent (1990), a spy thriller set in Berlin, and Black Dogs (1992), wherein a young man tries to stitch together his family’s memories.

McEwan’s admiration for Nabokov’s remark that readers must first “learn to fondle the details” certainly applies to the appreciator of McEwan’s own clear prose. Undoubtedly one of the most powerful images in his works is that of the man clinging to the hot-air balloon at the beginning of Enduring Love, “He had been on the rope so long that I began to think he might stay there until the balloon drifted down or the boy came to his senses and found the valve that released the gas, or until some beam, or god, or some other impossible cartoon thing, came and gathered him up… Even as I had that hope, we saw him slip down right to the end of the rope…. You could see the acceleration. No forgiveness, no special dispensation for flesh, or bravery, or kindness. Only ruthless gravity… . He fell as he had hung, a stiff little black stick”.

Apart from his brilliant prose, McEwan can also assimilate vast quantities of knowledge for the benefit of his fiction. His three most recent novels, Amsterdam, Atonement and Saturday demonstrate this ability of McEwan. Amsterdam, which tells the story of three men who reconnect at their former lover’s funeral, is a cutting social satire, sending up the sixties generation who seem to have resigned their former rebelliousness for creature comforts. In this short book McEwan demonstrates his copious knowledge of music and journalism in order to describe the occupations and preoccupations of his characters.

Although Amsterdam received the prestigious Booker Prize in 1998, Atonement was a true best-seller, receiving rave reviews on both sides of the Atlantic. McEwan’s research at the Imperial War Museum bears fruit in the careful descriptions of Briony Tallis’s experience as a nurse trainee at a London hospital during World War II and of Robbie Turner’s bewilderment during the British Army’s retreat from Dunkirk. The novel asks why Briony, a young girl who would be writer, pinpoints an innocent neighbour as the criminal who assaulted her cousin, and why she clings to her story even in the face of doubt. McEwan writes, “Did she really think she could hide behind some borrowed notions of modern writing, and drown her guilt in a stream — three streams! — of consciousness?”

The most autobiographical of McEwan’s works, Saturday has been hailed as the best post-9/11 work of fiction. A book set over the course of one twenty-four-hour period, it shares characteristics with earlier masterpieces of the genre including Ulysses and Mrs Dalloway, and it is also McEwan’s first effort at writing entirely in the present tense, a quality that explains Saturday’s occasional resemblance to John Updike’s Rabbit novels.

Henry Perowne, the protagonist, is a brain surgeon — a profession that lends well to the novel’s absorption in the mental health of individuals in current society. Perowne dislikes literature, but he shares McEwan’s love of wine, squash, and his wife, “What a stroke of luck, that the woman he loves is also his wife”, Perowne muses. Saturday strives to capture and present current society as it is, in all its ambiguities and anxieties, while also depicting what a man is willing to do when his family falls under threat. Although it received mostly glowing reviews, the display of scientific knowledge and terminology has led some critics to despair, whereas others have feared that its political agenda overwhelms the plot.

McEwan himself is not unaware of such a concern as he states, “I am aware of the danger that in trying to write more politically, I could take up moral positions that might pre-empt or exclude that rather mysterious and unreflective element that is so important in fiction”.

However, the reading public and critics concur — no matter whether they prefer the early, brutal stories, or the later, longer novels of ideas — that McEwan has mastered the “mysterious and unreflective element”, which creates great fiction.