In a unanimous verdict on November 9, the supreme court had paved the way for the construction of a Ram Temple at the disputed site and directed the Centre to allot five acres of land to the Sunni Waqf Board.
The Jamiat Ulama-i Hind, a prominent petitioner in case, has also decided to file a review petition challenging the Supreme Court’s verdict, Jamiat chief Arshad Madani said.
The third longest hearing in the top court was on the validity of Aadhaar scheme and had lasted for 38 days in the top court which came into existence in 1950.
'We will decide whether we will take it or not. If the Board decides to take land in its meeting, we will decide how it is to be taken and what will be its condition,' said Zufar Farooqui.
Justice Gogoi will pronounce judgement on the pleas seeking review of the top court's verdict allowing women of all ages to enter the Sabarimala temple in Kerala.
Earlier in the day, Supreme Court cleared the way for the construction of Ram temple at the disputed site in Ayodhya and directed the Centre to allot a five-acre plot to the Sunni Waqf Board for building a mosque.
'In the larger interest of the nation we should learn to accept something which you may not even agree with,' the former solicitor general said.
Mumbai police’s social media monitoring cell and cyber cell will monitor activities on Facebook, Twitter, WhatsApp, Instagram and other such platforms, he said.
Prime Minister mentioned the 2010 Allahabad High Court verdict of Ayodhya land dispute case and cautioned citizens to not exploit the situation as Supreme Court will soon pronounce the verdict on the case.
The party said since the judgement will have far-reaching implications, it is for the court to consider the consequences of its historic judgement by moulding the relief in a fashion that will reflect the constitutional values that this great nation espouses.
