Follow Us:

World Heart Day: Stethoscope can diagnose heart defects with 95% accuracy, finds study

The study shows that when a stethoscope is applied correctly, it could avoid unnecessary use of the more expensive investigations like echocardiography and allow for substantial reductions in healthcare costs and reduce the burden on the healthcare system.

SNS | New Delhi |

A simple use of a stethoscope could differentiate normal hearts from abnormal ones with accuracy of 95% and above, revealed a study conducted by Amrita Hospital, Kochi few days ahead of World Heart Day.

The study shows that when a stethoscope is applied correctly, it could avoid unnecessary use of the more expensive investigations like echocardiography and allow for substantial reductions in healthcare costs and reduce the burden on the healthcare system.

“This finding is of great significance for healthcare in low-resource settings like India,” said Dr. R. Krishna Kumar, Clinical Professor and Head, Pediatric Cardiology, Amrita Hospital, Kochi, who led the study.

The original research, published in British Medical Journal, Pediatrics Open, involved 545 children with suspected congenital heart defects.

The study for the first time systematically tested the diagnostic accuracy of physical examination of cardiovascular systems in children and compared it with echocardiography, the current gold standard to diagnose heart conditions.

“With increasing availability of ultrasound technology in cardiology in the form of echocardiography, there is a perception that physical examination of the patient with the age-old stethoscope is becoming redundant,” said Dr Kumar.

In the West, skills in using a stethoscope have declined to the point where many doctors have stopped using it altogether, he pointed.

However, in India many doctors still use the stethoscope to good effect and arrive at an accurate diagnosis.

“They recommend echocardiography only when a significant heart condition is identified. The purpose of this study was to validate the accuracy of examining the patient and listening with the stethoscope using a structured protocol and comparing the results with echocardiography,” stated Dr Kumar.

He added: “History and physical examination are traditional tools that contribute substantially to arriving at an accurate diagnosis and strengthen the doctor’s rapport with the patient. However, the importance of physical examination in patients with heart disease appears to be diminishing in recent times with the arrival of echocardiography.”

“Our study found that the humble stethoscope can serve as a useful method to screen patients in outpatient clinics. Physical examination involving a stethoscope is also quite good in correctly identifying common congenital heart diseases in children,” he added.

“The study underscores the utility of clinical examination in initial screening for commonly encountered congenital cardiac conditions in children even in the current era of echocardiography. It has demonstrated that a stethoscope is fairly reliable in out-patient settings where the patients are relatively stable. However, the results of the study are truly valid for these settings only. They may not apply to in-patient settings, newborns with suspected heart disease, and situations where the doctors are not trained adequately in examining the heart and in using the stethoscope,” the doctor said.