The resignation of Lt. Gen. Herzi Halevi as the head of the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) serves as a striking example of leadership accountability in the wake of a national security failure. Acknowledging his responsibility for the lapses that led to the devastating Hamas attack on 7 October 2023, General Halevi’s decision underscores the burden of command and the need for institutional introspection during crises. In his resignation letter, the military chief candidly admitted that the IDF had “failed in its mission to protect the citizens of Israel.”

His acceptance of this failure, coupled with his promise to deliver a thorough internal inquiry before his departure on March 6, reflects a commitment to transparency and reform. General Halevi’s words, “My responsibility for the terrible failure accompanies me every day, every hour, and will be so for the rest of my life”, highlight the personal and professional toll such events take on military leaders. The attack exposed severe shortcomings in intelligence, operational readiness, and strategic foresight. Over 1,200 lives were lost, and hundreds were taken hostage, despite prior warnings that went unheeded. Such lapses demand not only accountability from individuals but also systemic reforms to prevent similar tragedies.

Advertisement

While the IDF’s subsequent military operations in Gaza achieved significant tactical victories, including the dismantling of Hamas’s leadership and infrastructure, these successes do not absolve the leadership of its initial failures. General Halevi’s resignation, and that of Maj. Gen. Yaron Finkelman, the head of the IDF’s Southern Command, is a critical moment in Israel’s effort to restore public trust. It also raises questions about the broader political leadership’s role in this crisis. While General Halevi has sought a commission of inquiry to investigate the events of October 7, political leaders, including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, have so far resisted calls to accept responsibility, preferring to delay external investigations until the end of the conflict. This reluctance to embrace accountability at the highest levels risks deepening public frustration and erodes confidence in the government’s ability to manage future threats. Effective crisis management requires leaders to act decisively, accept responsibility, and implement meaningful reforms.

General Halevi’s resignation sets a standard for others to follow, both within Israel and globally. The incident also underscores the importance of balancing immediate military responses with long-term strategic planning. While the IDF continues to pursue its objectives in Gaza, including the release of hostages and the dismantling of Hamas’s operational capabilities, the need for a robust and transparent inquiry cannot be overstated. Leadership accountability, as demonstrated by General Halevi, is not merely about accepting blame ~ it is about creating an opportunity for renewal and resilience. Ultimately, General Halevi’s resignation is a stark reminder that the true measure of leadership lies not only in moments of triumph but also in the ability to confront and learn from failure. Israel’s security will depend on willingness to embrace this difficult process.