Alld HC takes suo motu cognisance regarding missing persons in UP
The next hearing in the case is scheduled for March 23.
The next hearing in the case is scheduled for March 23.
Appearing for the petitioner, advocate Prashant Bhushan contended that the scale and complexity of the alleged corporate fraud in the RCOM case exceeded even the financial irregularities uncovered in the Indiabulls matter.
The petition, filed by RTI activist Prakash Chandra Das, sought High Court’s intervention and direction to free the busy road from squatting for hassle-free movement of pedestrians and vehicular traffic.
While Justice B.V. Nagarathna held the provision to be arbitrary, Justice K.V. Viswanathan ruled that it is constitutionally valid, subject to the condition that instead of the Central or the State government, the prior sanction to proceed against a public servant would depend on the recommendation of the Lokpal or the Lokayukta (in the case of States).
A Bench comprising Chief Justice Surya Kant, Justice Joymalya Bagchi, and Justice Vipul M. Pancholi was hearing the PIL filed by retired Indian Revenue Service Officer B Balamurugan
A Bench comprising Chief Justice Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi was hearing a petition filed by Sarang Vaman Yadwadkar, which alleged that packaged drinking water sold in the country did not conform to benchmarks followed in the developed countries, including standards prescribed by the World Health Organisation (WHO).
Comply with Section 19 (b) provisions of the Sexual Harassment of Women and Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, or face contempt proceedings.
In the PIL, the petitioner claimed that the citizens' right to privacy was endangered by surveillance systems such as the Centralised Monitoring System (CMS)
A hearing on the case is scheduled for today in Court No-2 of the apex court.
While other Constitutional offices ensure security of tenure, the post of Governor remains vulnerable.
