For more than 100 years, the ratio of Hindu population in the Indian subcontinent has been declining. The dip, from 75.1 per cent in 1881 to 72.9 per cent in 1901, in British India created a paranoid reaction that Muslims would outnumber Hindus. This myth has been repeated after every census since.
The share of Hindus in Free India continued to drop, from 84.1 per cent in 1951 to 79.80 per cent in 2011, and the paranoia is now being used by Islamophobes to rile up Hindus for political reasons. Of India’s 1.3 billion people, Muslims constitute 15 per cent. Because of the staggering gap in these numbers, it is absurd to think that Indian Muslims would outnumber Hindus.
It is, however, true that India’s 200 million Muslims possess pendulum-swinging voting firepower, especially in minority-dominated areas. Across India’s eastern border, the Hindu growth rate paints a surprisingly different picture. Bangladesh is facinga reverse migration. Hindus have been moving back to Bangladesh from India since Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina recaptured power in 2009.
Confirmation of this trend came from no less a person than Shahriar Kabir, a journalist and pro-India man who is widely known as an anti-Islamist activist in Dhaka. “Over the past ten years, 250,000 Hindus have returned to Bangladesh. There has been no new migration to India. As a result, the Hindu population has risen by 2.5 per cent.”
India’s previous External Affairs Minister Sushma Swaraj also acknowledged the trend. “About the demographic changes in Bangladesh, as per statistics of the Bangladesh Bureau [of Statistics, which compiles demographic data in 2011 there were 8.4 per cent Hindus in the country, which has risen to 10.7 per cent in 2017,” she told Parliament.
This sudden surge in the Bangladeshi Hindu population, which had been in free fall since Partition in 1947, has fuelled wild speculation in Bangladesh ~ that pro-India Hasina has imported Bengali-speaking Hindus from India to fill key administrative positions in an attempt to tighten her grip on the nation.
Hindus had been historically denied top government jobs since the Pakistan days because they were suspected to be sympathetic to India. But now they seem ubiquitous. They all too often appear on television and in newspapers as government spokesmen. This phenomenon has caught public attention.
“The calculation of the percentage here is not clear to me. How did the Hindu population growth surpass the Muslims in the last few years? Can we assume that a great number of Hindus migrated to Bangladesh from India over the last few years?” asked Masud Kamal, senior news editor, Banglavision, a satellite TV channel in Dhaka.
The questions surrounding the Hindu influx have merit. Research shows the trend defies logic. A study, “Hindu Population Growth in Bangladesh: A Demographic Puzzle,” concluded that “Hindus have lower fertility, higher mortality and higher international out-migration rates than Muslims.” Given the demographic characteristics, the natural Hindu growth rate trails that of the Muslim.
Because of this anomaly, the rumour mill is in overdrive as to why the Hindu population suddenly soared in Bangladesh and how Hindus so quickly captured so many top jobs. Sceptics dismiss the influx as a hoax, arguing the government fabricated the numbers to appease India.
But they fail to explain the surge in Hindu high officials, giving credence to the import theory. No official explanation has been offered. This silence may be costly. In the event the hereditary frictions between the two communities again flare up, genuine Bangladeshi Hindus could be targeted by Muslim mobs on suspicion that they are “imported Hindus.”
The speculation surrounding the Hindu influx reflects a deep-rooted suspicion that marks Hindu-Muslim relations, a legacy of India’s age-old caste system. Most Bengali Muslims descended from oppressed and-resentful-lower-caste Hindus who converted to Islam rebelling against their higher-caste Hindu oppressors. There is still bad blood between the upper and lower castes, or Hindus and Muslims.
Paranoia toward Bangladesh and its majority Muslim population runs high among some of the elites in India. Some Hindus, especially those in West Bengal who share a common language and a rich culture with Bangladeshis, accuse their neighbour of tacitly harbouring anti-India terrorism. They also sound a false alarm, saying illegal migration into India is changing its religious
This rant reflects the century-old fear that Muslims would somehow outnumber Hindus and re-establish the Muslim empire in India. It is this fear that drove Hindutva guru V D Savarkar to oppose a Muslim country next to his Hindustan. Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s ultranationalist political outfit is using this anxiety against neighbouring Bangladesh to galvanize public support.
Bangladesh, the land of 163 million Bengalis, including 12 per cent Hindus, is India’s most friendly neighbour. Still, it has concerns about several bilateral matters, including a fiercely contentious assertion by Delhi that there are 40 million Bangladeshis living illegally in India and that they must be pushed back. This issue spoiled talks in Delhi in August between Bangladesh’s Home Minister Asaduzzaman Khan and his Indian counterpart Amit Shah.
The matter became so acrimonious that the two sides failed to issue the customary joint communique after the talks. “India is keen to sign a pact with Bangladesh for the deportation of illegal immigrants,” Press Trust of India news agency reported discussing the Shah-Khan talks.
“Shah is known for his tough stand against unabated illegal immigration from Bangladesh to India.” Delhi is going through a citizenship verification process to detect non-citizens, which is popularly known as the National Register of Citizens, or NRC in short, and has already classified nearly two million of its long-term residents as stateless.
Foreign minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar has assured that the citizenship verification drill is India’s internal matter; it will not affect Bangladesh. Modi has reassured his Bangladeshi counterpart Hasina twice, first at the United Nations in September and then in Delhi in October.
Questions still remain: Why did Shah push Khan for a treaty to deport illegal migrants? Why did not the Hasina-Modi joint statement include the assurance? There was no mention of the migration issue at all, a lapse that raises questions about India’s real intentions. One possible clue is that the Bharatiya Janata Party incited Hindus into religious-nationalistic fervour to win votes.
Now the BJP is between a rock and a hard place. It understands the folly of “Operation Pushback,” but still must appease its saffron warriors, who want a Muslim-free India. Or maybe Modi and Shah sincerely wish to resolve the “Muslim Question”, as their ideological guru Savarkar espoused nearly 100 years ago. During his election campaign, Modi told migrants in states bordering Bangladesh to keep their “bags packed.”
But his administration waited until his re-election in 2019 to bring up the deportation issue with Bangladesh. India’s anti-Bangladesh paranoia appeared so incendiary that it once caught the attention of an American diplomat. During a discussion in Kolkata with visiting US Embassy Dhaka’s political officer Denise Rollins, Dilip Mitra, additional director general of the state police for railways, listed a lengthy litany of complaints. He was convinced India’s arch-rival Pakistan had taken over Bangladesh; Pakistan’s military intelligence agency, backed by Islamic zealots, controlled Bangladesh’s army and its spy agency, all of which were working to make India “bleed from 1,000 cuts.”
On top of all this, he believed, illegal immigration from Bangladesh across a porous border was sharply increasing the Muslim proportion of West Bengal’s population. Ultimately, Hindus would become a minority in the state. He vowed to flee the state before the demographic change occurred.
Mitra’s remarks reflected anti-Bangladesh and often antiMuslim sentiments held by many other members of Kolkata’s elite with whom the diplomat held talks. These included a former deputy director of India’s foreign intelligence body, the Research and Analysis Wing; two former generals who ran the Centre for Eastern and Northeastern Regional Studies think tank; and Jayanta Kumar Ray, director of the Maulana Abul Kalam Azad Institute of Asian Studies, an affiliate of India’s Ministry of Culture.
What these people say matters. They often write opinion articles in local media, shaping popular perceptions against Bangladesh. Mitra’s strident views, for example, helped sabotage a renewed Dhaka-Kolkata rail link that would boost bonds between the two biggest Bengali cities.
“I was opposed to the link from Day One,” said Mitra, who was assistant director general of police for borders in West Bengal when the project started. It took two years for the government to meet the security requirements he demanded, including beefed up border patrols and several imposing fences, which greatly irritated the Bangladeshis.
Although the service restarted with great fanfare after a 43- year hiatus, ridership had been disappointing because immigration and customs procedures could take six hours, about four times longer than for buses. “It’s economically not viable,” Mitra said. He said he would be happier if the train did not run at all.
Despite all the railing against Bangladesh, its people still keep close ties with West Bengal. Nahida Rahman Shumona, counselor at the Deputy High Commission for Bangladesh in Kolkata, estimated roughly 30 per cent of West Bengalis have roots in Bangladesh and wish to see their neighbour prosper. Many Bangladeshis come to Kolkata for medical care and go shopping in the city’s vibrant markets and name-brand stores.
The mistrust of some Hindus toward Bangladesh is disturbing. It can only harm often-testy relations between the two countries. If the migration issue festers, business communities on both sides will go into hibernation. An economic nosedive will destabilize Bangladesh, and India will face an influx of refugees. Keeping lines of communication open is essential to successfully managing the bilateral relationship.
(The writer is the author of Bangladesh Liberation War, How India, US, China and the USSR Shaped the Outcome. His new book, One Eleven Minus Two, Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina’s War on Yunus an America, will be published shortly)