EC defends integrity of EVMs in SC, asserts it can’t be manipulated
The Election Commission of India (ECI) defended the integrity of the electronic voting system, asserting that it was not prone to any external interference or manipulations.
The Supreme Court has decided to revisit its 2010 verdict in the disproportionate assets case of former Bihar Chief Minister Lalu Prasad Yadav in which it had held that the state government has no authority to file an appeal against acquittal in cases probed by central agencies.
The issue cropped up as the Chhattisgarh government had to rush to the top court in 2011 challenging the acquittal of Amit Jogi, the son of former Chief Minister Ajit Jogi, in a 2003 murder case as the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) had not filed the appeal within the stipulated period.
However, during the interregnum, the top court’s three-judge bench in 2010 had delivered a verdict in Mr Yadav’s disproportionate assets case that the CBI, which was the prosecuting agency in the fodder scam, had the right to challenge the orders of the subordinate court and the state government had no locus standi.
Advertisement
When Jogi’s matter came up last week in the top court, the Chhattisgarh government doubted the correctness of the 2010 verdict in Mr Yadav’s case and a bench of Justices SK Kaul and KM Joseph directed that the matter be referred to a larger bench.
Advocate Sumeer Sodhi, appearing for the Chhattisgarh government, said that the top court’s judgement in the Lalu Prasad Yadav case is per incuriam (bad in law).
He said the 2010 judgement needs to be reconsidered as it affects the substantial rights of all states to file an appeal against the acquittal of an accused in a case investigated and prosecuted by the Central Bureau of Investigation or any other central agency.
On April 1, 2010 the top court had held that the Bihar government did not have the authority to file an appeal in the Patna High Court against the acquittal of Lalu Prasad Yadav and his wife and former Bihar chief minister Rabri Devi in a disproportionate assets case which was prosecuted by the CBI.
Advertisement
