Inside the mind of ‘Diggy Raja’: Why Digvijaya Singh’s remarks were planned to a T

While the BJP framed the episode as “Congress vs Congress” and weaponised it to target Rahul Gandhi, the sequence of events, or the “chronology” (as Union Home Minister Amit Shah once famously said), suggests deliberate planning rather than spontaneity.

Inside the mind of ‘Diggy Raja’: Why Digvijaya Singh’s remarks were planned to a T

File Photo: IANS

Digvijaya Singh has long been known for his provocative statements, many a time against the BJP and the RSS, thus earning him a reputation as a leader who speaks his mind regardless of uncomfortable political fallout. On Saturday, he stirred yet another controversy—this time one favouring the saffron side—and that too just as his party was preparing for a crucial Congress Working Committee (CWC) meeting to deliberate on the political situation and strategy against the BJP-led Centre.

While the BJP framed the episode as “Congress vs Congress” and weaponised it to target Rahul Gandhi, the sequence of events, or the “chronology” (as Union Home Minister Amit Shah once famously said), suggests deliberate planning rather than spontaneity. His social media post praising the organisational strength of the BJP and its ideological fountainhead RSS followed by reiteration around the same theme inside the closed-door CWC, was not a spontaneous or chance occurrence; it had been carefully timed and curated to ensure maximum amplification on the day of the important meeting.

Advertisement

Earlier, Singh had written to the party leadership seeking internal reforms, but that day he shared a black-and-white photograph of BJP veteran L K Advani and Prime Minister Narendra Modi, highlighting how grassroots workers in the Sangh-BJP ecosystem could rise through organisational ranks to become Chief Minister and Prime Minister—an argument frequently used by the BJP itself to attack Congress and Rahul Gandhi.

Advertisement

Then inside the CWC, Singh is said to have also warned of “active sleeper cells” within the Congress who, he alleged, were deliberately sabotaging the party’s progress and urged the leadership to identify and act against them. It is said that Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge intervened, bringing the agenda back to MGNREGA protests.

Singh later clarified that he was only praising organisational discipline and remained a staunch opponent of the RSS and PM Modi’s policies, but the agenda of the day had already set in the minds of media reporting the CWC.

Observers say such remarks can operate at different levels—as a calculated pressure tactic within the party or as a signal to the wider public. When paired with his praise for the BJP-RSS, it served another purpose, and that was to underline Congress’ internal weaknesses—poor cadre mobilisation, vacant posts and inability to convert movements into electoral gains.

The comments reflected long-standing complaints about Delhi-centric decision-making and delays in local appointments that, in his view, weaken the party’s grassroots structure.

From someone with grassroots connections as strong as “Diggy Raja”, it should have sounded a warning for the leadership.

For voters and fence-sitters, a senior Congress leader with grassroots connect praising BJP-RSS discipline risks reinforced perceptions that the grand old party was organisationally adrift and internally divided.

For the BJP, it was a validation of its long-standing opinion of being a ”superior party with organisation”.

But there is another angle, that of timing, with Singh’s Rajya Sabha term nearing its end amid stiff competition from within. So was he trying to project the image of an internal reformer at the risk of being labelled disloyal by rivals, or was he trying to cosy up to the BJP? There are also reports that no one openly challenged him during the CWC meeting, suggesting tacit acknowledgement of his concerns amid recent electoral setbacks and reducing traction to narratives like “vote chori”, MGNREGA etc.

Incidentally, Digvijaya Singh earned the nickname “Diggy Raja” as a young leader—a nickname that continues to stick to date.

Advertisement