Why the Centre’s plan to rename Raj Bhavans sparked a sharp clash in Rajya Sabha today

A Zero Hour mention escalated into a sharp clash after Dola Sen questioned the Centre’s directive to rename Raj Bhavans as Lok Bhavans, prompting procedural objections and political pushback.

Why the Centre’s plan to rename Raj Bhavans sparked a sharp clash in Rajya Sabha today

File image: Trinamool Congress MP Dola Sen speaks in the Rajya Sabha during the Monsoon Session of Parliament in New Delhi. (Sansad TV/ANI Video Grab)

A routine Zero Hour mention in the Rajya Sabha on Wednesday flared into a sharp political clash after All India Trinamool Congress (AITC) MP Dola Sen questioned the Centre’s directive to rename all Raj Bhavans as Lok Bhavans, a move she said was issued without any consultation with Parliament or state legislatures. The confrontation escalated further when her remarks drifted to other welfare issues, drawing objections from the Treasury benches and prompting a wider dispute over procedure and the space for debate in the Upper House.

The Ministry of Home Affairs had on November 25 asked states to rename Raj Bhavans, a step that has triggered unease in parts of the Opposition, which sees it as an attempt to recast long-standing institutional terminology. Wednesday’s exchange echoed that tension, with the government and Opposition accusing each other of stretching parliamentary rules to suit their positions.

Advertisement

Sen, raising the matter during Zero Hour, said neither Parliament nor state Assemblies had been kept in the loop. “But first of all, we would like to say that neither the Parliament, Assembly, nor the Cabinet is aware of this… They are not even discussing it with you, sir,” she said.

Advertisement

Chair directs removal of unrelated remarks

The exchange turned contentious when Sen flagged additional issues, including MGNREGA. Chairman C P Radhakrishnan intervened immediately, directing that the digressions would not be part of the official record.
Leader of the House JP Nadda also objected, saying the Zero Hour submission was limited to the renaming directive. “She spoke about MGNREGA and other issues. I would like to be very clear that because it does not relate to the subject, it should be deleted,” he said.

Radhakrishnan backed the intervention, reiterating that “anything deviated from the subject will not go on record”.

Opposition sees curbs on debate

Leader of the Opposition Mallikarjun Kharge defended Sen, arguing she had not used any unparliamentary language and that her remarks had been examined before she spoke.
Kharge further accused the government of curbing debate, “The Leader (of the House) is bulldozing. You don’t want to run according to parliamentary democracy.”

The Chair maintained that proceedings were being carried out as per the rules and urged members to remain within the subjects notified for Zero Hour.

Nadda rejects charge of ‘bulldozing’

Responding to Kharge, Nadda said he had not attempted to silence the Opposition. “I never bulldozed,” he said, adding that his intervention was only to ensure the discussion remained within the subject approved for Zero Hour.

Advertisement