Rajeshwar Singh questions post-retirement security disclosures, seeks clarity from ex-Army chief Naravane

BJP MLA from Sarojini Nagar in Lucknow Rajeshwar Singh on Monday raised concerns over what he described as a growing trend of post-retirement disclosures and political commentary on sensitive national security matters, asserting that accountability must be exercised during tenure and not after demitting office.

Referring to recent remarks by Leader of the Opposition Rahul Gandhi, who cited an unpublished book of former Army Chief General M.M. Naravane Singh said the nation deserves “clear and direct answers” on issues related to national security.

Advertisement

The BJP MLA posed a series of pointed questions, asking why Gen. Naravane did not resign if he believed serious national security threats existed and his views were ignored. He also questioned why the former Army Chief continued in office if he felt there was institutional resistance, and what prevented decisive action at a time when, Singh said, “constitutional authority, command, and responsibility were fully vested in him.”

“Gen. Naravane should come out and clear the air, as speculation will only make it worse,” Singh stated in a statement here on Monday.

He stressed that national interest is protected through timely decisions taken while in service, not through memoirs, interviews, or commentary after retirement. “Every officer of the armed forces and every civil servant takes an oath to the Constitution and the nation. If a matter genuinely involved national security, there was neither a legal nor a moral barrier to acting then. Speaking only after retirement raises questions of credibility, not courage,” he said.

Singh warned that selective disclosures after leaving office could weaken institutions, erode public trust, and create doubts around decision-making processes that require discipline and accountability.

He also criticised Rahul Gandhi and the Congress party for making statements on sensitive security issues based, he alleged, on partial understanding and political convenience. Raising a counter-question, Singh asked what “decisive and deterrent action” the Congress-led government had taken after the 26/11 Mumbai terror attacks.

“National security is not a subject for political point-scoring or retrospective heroism. History respects those who act when responsibility rests on their shoulders—not those who speak when it is safest to do so,” Singh added.