India’s OTT crackdown faces a new challenge as microdrama platforms push suggestive content through social media ads, raising questions over regulation, accountability, and digital safety.
Representative Image: Unsplash
India’s digital entertainment space received a sharp regulatory warning in April 2025. The Supreme Court issued notices to Netflix, Amazon Prime Video, Ullu, and ALTBalaji after former Central Information Commissioner Uday Mahurkar filed a petition alleging obscene and perverse content on these platforms.
The government followed through. Twenty-five OTT platforms accused of hosting vulgar and sexually explicit material were banned shortly after.
Advertisement
The signal was clear: consequence-free digital content had run its course.
Advertisement
Despite the crackdown, one segment of India’s entertainment economy shows no sign of adjusting. That’s the microdrama and short-video streaming industry.
Paid advertisements from platforms like Story TV and Quick TV are currently running across Instagram and Facebook. The content leans heavily on sexual innuendo, suggestive themes, and provocative storytelling built for algorithmic reach.
Quick TV operated by Mohalla Tech, ShareChat’s parent company, is actively promoting series titled ‘Main Brahmachari Tu Kanyakumari’. Promotional material shows intimate positioning between characters paired with dialogue such as “Jo karna hai kariyein naa,” line widely understood to carry explicit sexual undertones given its context. Ad closes with prompt to “Start Free Trial Now.”
This is not user-generated content that slipped past moderation. It is paid promotion approved and distributed to mass audiences across major social media platforms including minors and unsuspecting users.
Story TV, operated by Eloelo, is running promotions for a series called ‘Mafia of Wasseypur’. The title borrows directly from the cultural recall built by the acclaimed ‘Gangs of Wasseypur’ franchise. The content packages violence, power dynamics, and sexually suggestive storytelling into short-form episodic material designed for binge consumption.
The regulatory framework behind the Supreme Court petition does not exempt short-form platforms.
Under Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021, OTT services are classified as “online curated content providers.” They are required to implement age classifications, content descriptors, parental controls, access restrictions for mature content.
The Information Technology Act and Indecent Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act also apply regardless of whether content is delivered in long-format episodes or short vertical videos.
Legal experts have been clear on this point. The format of distribution cannot become a loophole to bypass regulatory obligations.
The Supreme Court’s concern was not limited to obscenity in isolation. The court flagged the broader issue of normalisation, what repeated digital exposure to explicit themes does to public perception over time.
Critics argue that content portraying coercion as romance or framing predatory behaviour as entertainment contributes to cultural erosion court was attempting to address.
Traditional OTT platforms require intentional app downloads and age-verification steps. Microdrama platforms bypass that entirely.
Promotional clips are pushed directly through social media advertising systems. They surface in the feeds of minors and general audiences without meaningful safeguards. The content does not wait to be found, it is delivered.
The government has already acted against 25 OTT platforms. The question now facing regulators and courts is whether those same standards will apply to the growing short-video entertainment ecosystem.
Microdrama platforms are currently reaching wider audiences than several of the banned platforms, and doing so through the most algorithmically powerful distribution channels available. Yet they continue to operate without comparable scrutiny.
India’s digital entertainment regulation debate has shifted. It is no longer focused solely on long-format OTT platforms. It now extends to the algorithm-driven world of short-form streaming, where content moderation, audience protection, and platform accountability remain unclear.
The question is not whether the rules exist. They do. The question is whether they will be enforced before the industry normalises what the Supreme Court has already flagged as a problem.
Advertisement
