Indian Knowledge Systems (IKS) encompass all forms of human thought and action derived from the culture of the Indian subcontinent over the course of thousands of years.
Photo:SNS
Indian Knowledge Systems (IKS) encompass all forms of human thought and action derived from the culture of the Indian subcontinent over the course of thousands of years. These encompass philosophical and religious literature (Vedas, Upanishads, and Darshanas), along with medical practices (Ayurveda), mathematics, astronomy, linguistics, visual arts, architecture, social theories, legal systems, and pedagogical methods. IKS does not separate aspects of existence, including knowledge, morals, religious observance, governance, and craft; rather, it views them as interrelated by shared meanings and ultimate goals.
Another point to clarify is that IKS does not represent one doctrine, but is a collection of teachings, exchanges, and arguments. Each school of thought represented in Vedic literature (the Mimamsa school, the Nyaya school) is distinct; nevertheless, they share commonalities in their approach to understanding faith. The Buddhist and Jain schools each evolved their own routes of thought that sometimes mirror one another; on the other hand, the oral traditions of local craft people, and vernacular literature were all part of the evolving environment in which the various philosophies developed. Many of the strands share common elements: the importance placed on experience as a teacher, the ethical ramifications of one’s views, the relationship between a guru and his shishya, and the goal of transforming either one’s personal character or society via knowledge.
Advertisement
IKS in its nature carries a set of values, practices, and institutions through which Indians were able to explore reality, create ethical lives, and produce the technologies and arts necessary for human flourishing. This definition is based upon three forms of inquiry, Epistemic (how do I know); Practical (what do I do with this knowledge), Normative (why do I seek out such ends). The Core Insight is articulated by the following statement, “The Indian Knowledge System holds that Jñāna (knowledge) and Guṇa (virtue) are inseparable; therefore, the true measure of learning is how one acts and conducts themselves.”
Advertisement
Thus, this definition includes the basic and most important characteristic of Bhartiya Gyan Parampara that if anyone knows something, it must be apparent in his/her action and behavior. Most people tend to believe that they have gained an education simply by learning a list of propositions about various subjects or acquiring new pieces of information. However, according to many Indian concepts of enlightened education, the definition of knowledge is different. According to the philosophy of IKS, knowledge is much more than a collection of facts; it is also based upon the relationship of each fact to the context in which it was created and the purpose for which it was intended.
In addition, many Indian philosophers emphasise the importance of realization (Pratyaksa or anubhuti) as a higher form of knowledge. Unlike merely agreeing intellectually with what you have learned, realization is about how learning has changed you as a human being. Under this view of learning, when you develop an understanding of a particular subject, that subject will not be fully understood until you have experienced a change in the way you perceive the world, the way you behave toward others, and the way you think about yourself. Similarly, realization is the process by which you develop an understanding of how to make wise decisions about your life.
When learning has reached the level of realization, moral discretion, health practices, and how to live a balanced life based upon experiences in this world will guide your actions. Therefore, at the last level of the hierarchy, re-emphasizing the need for development wisdomasa foundation for living a productive life with balance between ethics and technology will provide the best means for educating future generations of humans. Several recurring features help distinguish IKS from other knowledge traditions. A deep understanding of Indian Knowledge is the unity of existence. This idea is conveyed in the phrase “ Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam” (The world is one family). All parts of the universe are connected, including the cosmic dimension, the natural world, society, and the individual. We do not exist alone in our own right; all forms of knowledge, all modes of truth, and all expressions of art and science exist together as an integral part of the same consciousness.
For example: Ayurveda derives insights from Sām. khya (cosmology and metaphysics), Nyāya-Vaiśes. ika (logic and atomism), and Dharmaśāstra (ethics and duty), embodying a union of philosophy, science, and morality. Vāstu Śāstra integrates Jyotisha (astronomy), Shulba Sūtras (geometry), and ecological principles, creating harmony between space, nature, and human habitation. The R. g Veda’s earliest sign of an integrated vision can be found in verse 1.164.46: “Ekam sat viprā bahudhā vadanti.” This means, “Truth is one; the wise say in multiple ways.” This verse represents Advaita or the philosophy of oneness; it reflects the concept that even though there are many diverse paths, disciplines and experiences lead to the same ultimate truth.
Indian knowledge tradition is not only about theory, but also focuses on application, experience, and outcome. Each field of study has an established metric by which to determine the effectiveness of its application. In the tradition of India, knowledge is validated by the results obtained from experience or the effects an individual’s actions have had on his/her world – not simply by theory (i.e., abstract thought). The concept of using “Prayojana” is the basis for this practical orientation. In IKS, the process of enquiry (anves. an. a) is not carried out in a value-neutral way. The act of acquiring knowledge is inherently ethical, purposeful, and transformational.
Its end ambition is not only to know what truth is, but also to enable the flourishing of Dharma, Artha, Kāma and Moksa collectively known as the Purusharthas (the fourfold goals of human life). While modern Western views may see fact as separate from value and science as separate from ethics, Indian epistemology does not have such a separation and sees them as being inseparable aspects of truth. In IKS, the concept of knowledge does not exist without that of values. Wisdom is the highest level of truth realisation and it must uphold life, justice and harmony. The process of enquiry is therefore directed by the principle of Lokasamgraha – “the good and oneness of all beings.”
In Arthaśāstra, moral conduct is linked to economic policy; ensuring that the governance serves as the foundation for balance and justice in society. In the Bhagavad Gītā, Karma, or action, illustrates that action is a means of self-purification and that we collectively uplift each other by taking action aligned with duty and compassion. The Guru-Shishya Parampara or the teacher-disciple lineage is the spiritual and pedagogical foundation of IKS. In this living model, the guru is not only an instructor of facts but a mentor, moral guide, and spiritual guide. The goal of education is not the accumulation of information, but the awakening of wisdom (jnāna) and refinement of character – sadācāra. In IKS there are three stages of learning:
1) Descriptive narrative by the guru;
2) Deep reflection on the truth to know the meaning and alleviate doubt, and
3) Meditative contemplation that leads to realisation whereby transformation results. The oral tradition has allowed for direct dialogue, experiential learning, clear-headed reasoning, and moral cultivation. It is within this visual dialogical format that true humility, devotion, and discipline exist and are necessary for true learning. Exemplary Classical Dialogues such as the Gārgī and Yājñavalkya dialogue (Br. hadāran. yaka Upanis. ad 3.6.1 – 3) illustrate a rational, dialogical form of pedagogy that encourages inquiry and reasoning in spiritual discussions, irrespective of gender.
The concept of “epistemology” within philosophy acknowledges that different modes of knowing can be valid sources of information, and therefore Indian philosophy includes multiple philosophical traditions (darśanas) existing together, debating each other, and adding to the cumulative quest for understanding. Indian philosophers realised that one way of viewing reality does not provide the complete view of what is real. Hence, multiple sources of knowledge were identified as valid methods of obtaining knowledge:
1. Pratyaks.a (perception) – Knowledge that you have because of your direct experience through either your senses or your intuition;
2. Anumāna (inference) – Knowledge that you derive using your ability to think logically;
3. Śabda (testimony) – Knowledge based on reliable and trustworthy verbal reports, particularly those you receive in the form of testimony from the Vedas and/or from other sages or ‘enlightened’ beings;
4. Upamāna (comparison) – Understanding that comes through analogy or resemblance to some other examples;
5. Arthāpatti (postulation) – Knowledge inferred from the existence of o there circumstances when no direct evidence exists and,
6. Anupalabdhi (nonperception) – Knowledge of what is not there, using this form of knowledge in Advaita Vedānta. The pluralistic framework makes IKS dialogical rather than dogmatic, open to discussion and reinterpretation. The Indian tradition of ideas is maintained through commentaries as a continuity rather than an element of discontinuity. The texts are treated as living entities that grow with intervening generations through various levels of understanding. Rather than destroying the initial productions, Indian scholars continue in an evolving process of dialogue with texts, and the result is the creation of multiple levels of interpretations including the following: Bhās.ya (Commentary – Analytical explanation), Tīkā: (The explanations or additions given to the text) and T. ippanī (Notes/Annotations – Supplementary insights for the original text).
This ensures the preservation as well as renewal of knowledge. We have a beautiful example for this tradition: the Vadrayana-written Bhahmsutra which is the original text for vedant darshan. Govindpata wrote Mahābhāsya on this, Śan· kara’s commentaries on reviving this, and the emergence of Rāmānuja and Madhva schools of thought in response to Śan· kara are classic examples of tradition and continuity of knowledge tradition. It is this hermeneutic tradition which has sustained Indian Knowledge Systems through the ages, with dialogue within themselves which transcends time. This tradition, which thinks about cosmic well-being, is the best way to lead the world in a sustainable way.
(The writer is Assistant Professor, KSAS – Lucknow & INADS – USA.)
Advertisement
