From long experience of working closely with young students and observing the wider social environment, one disturbing tendency has become increasingly visible. Individuals who fail to cultivate creativity, intellectual curiosity, or meaningful professional skills sometimes view politics as an easy refuge. Instead of investing effort in education, innovation, or constructive engagement with society’s real problems, they are drawn toward political spaces where visibility and influence may be obtained without demonstrating genuine competence or intellectual contribution.
This trend raises serious concerns about the long-term quality of leadership and the direction in which public life may be heading, of course there may be exception. In principle, politics should attract individuals with vision, imagination, and a deep commitment to public welfare. Leadership requires the capacity to analyse complex problems, understand social realities, and design policies that advance collective progress. When politics becomes a convenient option for those unwilling to pursue intellectual growth or creative endeavour, the standards of public discourse inevitably decline. Governance then risks becoming reactive rather than thoughtful, driven by short-term calculations rather than a clear understanding of society’s long-term needs.
Young people must therefore recognise that leadership begins with knowledge, not with the sudden desire for authority. Before aspiring to positions of influence, they must devote themselves to the demanding but rewarding process of education. Learning encourages disciplined thinking, nurtures ethical awareness, and develops the analytical skills required for responsible decision-making. These qualities cannot be acquired overnight; they emerge through years of careful study, observation, and engagement with diverse ideas. Without such preparation, political ambition may easily drift away from its true purpose of public service. Education is far more than a pathway to employment or personal advancement. It forms the foundation of responsible citizenship.
Through education, individuals develop the ability to question assumptions, interpret evidence, and understand the broader consequences of their actions. A society that undervalues intellectual development in favour of immediate authority risks producing leaders who may command attention but lack the depth to guide complex institutions. True leadership grows gradually through sustained interaction with knowledge and experience. When this essential preparation is bypassed, the quality of public decision-making inevitably suffers. The urgency of this concern becomes even clearer in an age defined by rapid scientific and technological change. Modern societies face challenges that demand informed and imaginative leadership.
Environmental degradation, climate instability, technological disruption, public health emergencies, and widening economic inequality require policies grounded in careful reasoning and scientific understanding. Leaders entrusted with public responsibility must be capable of evaluating data, interpreting research, and balancing competing priorities with intellectual clarity. Without such competence, policies risk becoming superficial responses to problems that require far deeper understanding. Yet politics is often perceived, in many contexts, less as a field of service and more as a pathway to prestige and material comfort. When power becomes associated primarily with privilege rather than responsibility, it inevitably attracts individuals motivated by personal advancement. Such a perception weakens the moral foundation of public life.
A political culture that rewards spectacle over substance discourages thoughtful participation and gradually erodes public confidence in democratic institutions. Addressing this challenge requires collective effort. Educational institutions, families, and communities must reaffirm the importance of intellectual preparation before the pursuit of public authority. Schools and colleges should encourage curiosity, critical inquiry, and scientific temper rather than limiting education to mechanical memorisation. When young people learn to question, analyse, and think independently, they become capable of contributing meaningfully to both professional fields and civic life.
Education thus becomes not only a personal asset but also a vital resource for democratic society. Equally important is the recognition that science and technology now play a decisive role in shaping national progress. Countries that have achieved sustained development have done so by investing heavily in research, innovation, and higher education. Their leaders understand that scientific advancement is not confined to laboratories or academic institutions; it drives economic growth, improves healthcare, strengthens infrastructure, and supports environmental sustainability. Policies that encourage research and technological development therefore benefit society in profound and lasting ways. For this reason, political leadership must be closely aligned with the advancement of knowledge.
Leaders who value scientific thinking recognise the importance of strengthening universities, supporting research institutions, and creating opportunities for young minds to explore new ideas. When politics encourages intellectual exploration and technological innovation, the results extend far beyond academic achievement. Such an environment generates employment, improves public services, and enhances the overall resilience of society. The strength of a democracy depends not merely on electoral processes but on the intellectual character of those who aspire to lead it.
Politics must never become a refuge for those unwilling to cultivate creativity or knowledge. Instead, it should remain a field where ideas, integrity, and informed judgment guide public action. When education is valued as the first step toward leadership, society benefits from individuals who combine knowledge with responsibility. Only under such conditions can public life regain its dignity and fulfil its essential purpose: guiding the nation toward thoughtful progress and collective well-being.
(The writer is former Senior Scientist, Central Pollution Control Board.)