A personal journey of nurturing talent

Classroom, (file photo)


Education is not the learning of facts, but the training of the mind to think, said Albert Einstein. For the past six years, my work with students has been devoted to introducing and strengthening critical thinking in their learning journey. I often observe that many students struggle to achieve success in life – not because they lack talent or determination, but because they are shaped by an education system that prioritizes marks over real learning, memory over creativity, and conformity over individuality.

As a result, students grow up uncertain about their passions, unprepared for real-world challenges, and lacking the confidence to explore new opportunities – creating a gap between academic performance and true success. Too often, the emphasis on rote learning and examination outcomes prevents children from exploring ideas or understanding concepts at a deeper level. During classroom interactions, it becomes evident that students rely heavily on teachers’ prompts, struggle to justify their reasoning, and hesitate to express their own thoughts. Many quietly wait for the “correct answer” rather than sharing their perspectives. When I ask, “Can you explain your reasoning behind a particular science or mathematics experiment?” several students become unsure, as the question does not come directly from the textbook.

Such interactions reveal that they have not been encouraged to question, analyse, or explore ideas independently – they expect information to be given, not discovered. These classroom conversations highlight the extent to which critical thinking is missing and underline the urgent need to guide students from passive learning toward active reasoning. In today’s world, critical thinking is one of the most essential skills for success, yet many students continue to learn in ways that limit their ability to question, analyse, and think independently. Recognizing this challenge, I have established specialized Mathematics and Science Laboratories to create an experiential learning environment where students can observe, experiment, reflect, and develop the skills needed to become curious, creative, and critical thinkers. The lab has become a place where students step away from rote memorization and step into the world of hands-on discovery.

Here, they build models, test ideas, measure outcomes, and learn through active investigation. For many, this has opened a door to a kind of learning they never thought possible. Concepts that once felt difficult in the classroom suddenly make sense when experienced through experiments and practical activities. What is most remarkable is the confidence our students have gained. Children who once hesitated to speak now eagerly explain their observations. Students who struggled with abstract concepts now demonstrate them with clarity using tools, models, and experiments they designed themselves. Their ability to think critically-to question, analyze, and reason-has grown stronger with every activity. One of the most heartwarming transformations has been the spirit of collaboration the lab has fostered.

Whether solving a mathematical puzzle, testing the Bernoulli principle, or building a working model, students support one another, share ideas, and celebrate each o ther ’s achievements. The lab has become a space where teamwork and creativity shine as brightly as academic success. Parents often share stories of how their children talk excitedly at home about the experiments they performed – how they made a balloon-powered car, used geometric tools to create designs, or conducted simple chemistry reactions safely under guidance. These conversations show us that the lab’s impact travels far beyond the school walls. This initiative refle cts my observations, the current gaps in learning, and the pressing need to transform our teaching approach to nurture strong intellectual habits. Despite my sincere efforts to develop hands-on learning experiences, another significant barrier I face is excessive mobile usage, which increasingly jeopardizes students’ critical thinking abilities.

Constant exposure to quick-scroll content, instant answers, and entertainmentdriven apps conditions young minds to seek immediate gratification rather than engage in patient analysis or problem-solving. Instead of exploring ideas deeply or forming their own conclusions, many students simply “Google the answer,” bypassing the cognitive struggle that builds reasoning ability. Mobile addiction reduces attention span, discourages reflective thinking, and limits opportunities for meaningful conversations – elements essential for nurturing curiosity and logical judgment. As students become more dependent on digital shortcuts, their ability to question, evaluate information, and think independently weakens, posing a serious threat to their intellectual growth and long-term learning potential.

Excessive dependence on private tuition further intensifies these challenges. Tuition often reduces students’ capacity to learn independently, as many rely on tutors for ready-made answers instead of developing their own problem-solving skills. It also increases academic pressure and stress, leaving little time for rest, hobbies, or healthy social interactions. Moreover, the financial burden of tuition creates inequality, leaving students who cannot afford it feeling disadvantaged. Over time, students may lose confidence in classroom learning and become less motivated to think creatively, hindering both academic and personal development.

By integrating inquiry-based methods, hands-on learning environments such as the Mathematics and Science Laboratories, and reflective classroom discussions, we can empower students to become confident thinkers and lifelong learners. Let us commit to creating a classroom culture where curiosity is encouraged, mistakes are viewed as opportunities, and every child feels inspired to explore their own ideas. The journey toward stronger critical thinking begins with us, and together, we can ensure that every student discovers the power of their own mind.

(The writer is a former Senior Scientist, Central Pollution Control Board.)