SC refuses to stay trial against Lalu Prasad Yadav in land-for-jobs case

File Photo: IANS


The Supreme Court on Friday declined to stay the ongoing criminal proceedings before a Special CBI court here against RJD chief Lalu Prasad Yadav in the land-for-jobs scam, which dates back to his tenure as railway minister between 2004 and 2009.

A bench of Justice M M Sundresh and Justice Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh refused to interfere with the Delhi High Court’s May 29 order that had similarly rejected Yadav’s plea for a stay on the trial.

“We are not inclined to interfere except by observing that at the time of disposing of the final matter, the observations made in the impugned order will not stand in the way. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, we are inclined to pass a further order to the effect that (Yadav) may not be personally present before the trial court and therefore his appearance is dispensed with. We request the High Court to expedite the hearing,” the bench stated in its order.

The court thus disposed of Yadav’s petition seeking a stay on the trial and granted him exemption from personal appearance before the trial court.

Earlier, the Delhi High Court had issued notice to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) on Yadav’s plea for quashing of the FIR, but found no compelling reason to stall proceedings before the trial court. The matter is next listed on August 12.

Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal, appearing for Yadav, argued that the investigation was vitiated for lack of prior sanction under Section 17A of the Prevention of Corruption Act—mandatory before initiating inquiry against a public servant.

However, Additional Solicitor General SV Raju, representing the CBI, contended that Section 17A was not applicable to the case as the alleged offences were committed before the 2018 amendment which introduced this requirement.

The land-for-jobs case involves allegations that Yadav misused his ministerial position to secure land and immovable properties for his family members in exchange for appointments to Group “D” posts in the Indian Railways.

The CBI has alleged that between 2004 and 2009, several such appointments were made without public advertisement, allegedly facilitated by senior officials in the West Central Railways under Yadav’s instructions. These appointments, the agency claims, violated recruitment norms and were awarded in return for land parcels transferred to Yadav’s family members.

On June 7, the CBI filed a detailed charge sheet naming Lalu Prasad Yadav, members of his family, and 77 others, including 38 beneficiaries of the alleged illegal appointments.