n a late development, the Haryana Government, led by Chief Minister Nayab Singh Saini, has sent its top cop, Shatrujeet Kapur, on leave. He is among several IPS and IAS officers who are named in the suicide note of senior IPS officer Y Puran Kumar as his key tormentors.
The BJP has also postponed Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s October 17 rally in Sonipat, which was scheduled to celebrate a year of the current saffron dispensation in the date.
According to reports, a new date will be announced soon.
Several leaders from across the country are visiting the family of Late Kumar in Chandigarh, pressing the demand for swift action against those named by the deceased senior IPS officer in his suicide note.
On Monday, Telangana Deputy Chief Minister Mallu Bhatti Vikramarka met the bereaved family of the officer in Chandigarh. At the same time, while Chief Minister A Revanth Reddy spoke over the phone with Kumar’s wife, IAS officer Amneet P Kumar, to express solidarity and support,
Vikramarka expressed deep shock over the delay in action against the officers named in Kumar’s alleged suicide note. He said the deceased officer had clearly mentioned two senior officials – DGP Shatrujeet Kapur and SP Narendra Bijarniya – accusing them of continuous humiliation and harassment.
“Shouldn’t the government act in accordance with the law when there is such direct evidence?” the deputy Chief Minister asked, emphasising the need for urgent and impartial investigation.
Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi is scheduled to visit the residence of the late officer on October 14, to offer his condolences to the family.
Earlier in the day, Congress MP Deepender Singh Hooda led a party delegation to pay respects to the departed soul.
Hooda reiterated his demand for a high-level probe into the case by a Special Investigation Team (SIT) headed by a sitting judge of the Supreme Court, stressing that only an independent inquiry can ensure justice in the matter.
The ‘mysterious’ death of Puran Kumar, alleged to be a suicide, continues to generate political furore, institutional pressure and procedural standoffs in Chandigarh, the joint capital of Punjab and Haryana.
Six days after his death, the body of Kumar remains in the mortuary at PGIMER here, as the family has not given consent for the postmortem. The family is demanding that those named in the officer’s “final note” first be arrested, before a postmortem is permitted.
Police have warned that delaying the autopsy risks loss of crucial forensic evidence, though legal provisions allow postmortem in the presence of a magistrate without family consent in certain cases.
Meanwhile, the investigation is intensifying. On the request of Puran Kumar’s wife, the police have amended the FIR to invoke the more stringent Section 3(2)(v) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, in addition to earlier invoked sections. This section carries a potential life sentence in cases where an offense against a SC/ST individual involves grievous injury or extreme harm.
The names of around 16 senior officers including Haryana DGP Shatrujeet Kapur and the then Rohtak SP Narendra Bijarniya appear in the note, with serious allegations of harassment, caste bias, and mental torture.
Since then, Bijarniya has been transferred, and Surinder Singh Bhoria has been appointed as new SP Rohtak. The Chandigarh Police has constituted a six-member Special Investigation Team (SIT) led by IG Pushpendra Kumar to oversee the probe.
In Punjab, the State Scheduled Castes Commission, dissatisfied with the progress, has ordered the Chandigarh Police to take immediate action and arrest the 14 people named in the suicide note. The commission chairman, Jasvir Singh Garhi, expressed concern that the police report submitted lacked clarity on whether an FIR was filed against them.
Political leaders across parties have weighed in. Punjab Finance Minister Harpal Singh Cheema cited the “final note” as evidence of sustained caste-based harassment, calling the case a national shame.
The broader public reaction has been one of outrage and demand for transparency. The incident has triggered fresh debates over institutional caste discrimination, protection of officers from within-service harassment and the role of independent oversight in police conduct.
At present, the case stands at a challenging juncture: no postmortem, contested FIR amendments, strong political pressure and escalating demands for swift justice. How the SIT, Chandigarh Police, and state governments respond will be closely watched, as will whether due process prevails amid the clamour for accountability.